Legal Remedies Against Solicitation of Clients by Former Employees

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...
Adv. Anant Sharma
Mr. Anant Sharma, Co-Founder of My Lawyers Advice

Follow us

Solicitation of Clients and procuring work by former employees has been a huge problem for many Corporations not only in India but across the globe. The same causes irreparable damages, injuries, and losses both monetary and non-monetary to the Corporations. The act of soliciting work by poaching Clients is both illegal and unlawful and has to be dealt with stern legal action against the erring former employee. The most potent way to reduce this threat is to execute a Non-Solicitation Agreement with all the employees, at the time of their appointment and induction.

A Non-Solicitation Agreement stops a former employee or an employee from dealing with the Corporation’s clients and customers and soliciting work from them, against the interests of the Corporation. Employee agrees to not solicit clients or customers for their benefit during the tenure of their employment or anytime thereafter. 

Further, Non-Solicitation commitments have to be enforced carefully since certain clauses cannot be considered as restraint of business, profession or trade and cannot be subject to Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872 as held in Wipro Ltd. vs Beckman International (2006(3) ARBLR 118 Delhi).

Remedies available under the Civil Laws

Solicitation contracts are private in nature, the contract should itself include clauses in case there is a breach, in liquidated penalty or damage under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872 and in the absence of such clauses, parties can turn to civil Courts or arbitration for an injunction and damages for breach under Section 73 of the Indian  Contract Act of 1872.

In the case of Desiccant Rotors International Pvt. Ltd v Bappaditya Sarkar & Anr. (CS(OS) No.337 of 2008), the Court upheld an injunction against the manager restricting him/her from soliciting customers of Desiccant and its suppliers. Further, in the case of Embee Software Pvt. Ltd. v. Samir Kumar Shaw (Original Side, GA No.2171 of 2012), the Court held that acts of solicitation done by former employees to tempt the customers of the former employer into ending their existing contract and signing a contract with the former employee, or stopping others from signing contracts with the former employer cannot be acceptable. 

Provisions under Civil Law to Enforce Non-Solicitation Agreements

  • Serving legal notice to the employee. 
  • Enforcing undertakings or cheque encashment based on terms of the agreement. 
  • Filing civil suit for injunction under Order 39, Rule 1 and Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 or damages as well as specific performance of a contract. 
  • Initiating suit for declaration that acts of the employee are a tortious intrusion in the business of employer and injunction thereto.

Remedies available under the Criminal Laws

If the former employee solicits customers or employees by using the stolen data that belonged to the former employee, then it would be violating both Section 378 and Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for theft since data is considered a movable property as decided in the case of R.K. Dalmia v. Delhi Administration, (AIR 1962 SC 1821).  Here, the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the term “property” cannot be just movable property but also corporeal property. In such a case, a criminal complaint can be filed and the violator shall face a punishment of imprisonment of either description for a term up to three years, or with fine, or with both. If the former employee uses information that he/she was trusted with, for purpose of solicitation, Section 408 of the Indian Penal Code of 1860, is a legal remedy, that can be used for deterrence, given that the punishment is imprisonment which may extend to seven years along with paying of fine.

Section 2 (o) of the Copyright Act of 1957 protects any database, which comes under the purview of the definition of the term literary work as seen in Burlington Home Shopping Private Limited v. Rajnish Chibber (61 (1995) DLT 6), where the Court prevented an ex-employee from using the company database for the client list. The employer, in this case, can take action under Section 63 of Copyright Act of 1957, which has a punishment of six months imprisonment that can extend up to three years and also fine can be levied of fifty thousand rupees which can extend up to 3 lacs.

Pre-Conditions under the Non-Solicitation Agreement

For Non-Solicitation Agreements to be considered legal, it has to be ensured that such agreement does not outright prohibit lateral hiring of people who are already experts in the required fields. The agreement must allow for lateral hiring by competitors.

Such agreements may include the following:

  • the former employee be required to ask for permission from a former and current employee,
  • a notice period required if still underemployment,
  • a certain amount of compensation to be given to the former employer for loss of talent,
  • conditions concerning the execution of non-disclosure agreements,
  • non-compete clauses and adherence thereto; etc.

No bar should be placed on employment opportunities for the employee.

In conclusion, discussions regarding  Section 27 of the Contract Act of 1872 has clearly pointed to the fact that that solicitation restraints can be enforced on both an employee and a former employee since these restrictions do not restrict a person’s ability to look for another job or partake in any kind of business, it merely restricts the solicitation of clients and customers. Failure to adhere to the Non-Solicitation Agreements can attract penalties under both civil and criminal law and the former employers are well within their rights to exercise such legal action.

This Article is written by Adv. Anant Sharma, Co-Founder My Lawyers Advice and Parinay Gupta, 5th Year Law Student, Amity Law School, Delhi. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

Women Advocates Move To Supreme Court Against the Delhi HC Orders on Resuming Physical Hearing

Another writ petition has been filed by women advocates in the Supreme Court against the decision of the Delhi HC of directing the expansion of physical hearing of cases within the National Capital Territory of Delhi without giving an option to litigants to be represented by their lawyers virtually.

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus. The petition sought to direct...

Gujarat High Court Directs To Register Name of Petitioners in the Society Records as Owners of Property, as per Will

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that the petitioners were entitled to...

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there is no requirement of passing...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -