Inefficacy of the Bollywood-Legal World: Rephrase Contracts or Reform Celebrity Management Companies?

Must Read

The Right to Information and its Working of 15 years

On 12th October 2020, RTI finished fifteen years since its commencement. The question remains whether the legislation stands up to...

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

Follow us

The appalling demise of actor Sushant Singh Rajput (SSR) has left Bollywood in dismay. His death has led to several controversies in the Bollywood industry. Some people have stated that nepotism in Bollywood is the main cause of his death. Some have stated other factors like clinical depression on the ground that the actor was suffering from depression for the past 6 months.

It’s not the first time that an actor has committed suicide. In the past too, such incidents have attracted public attention. However, they fade away after a period of time. The author, now, considers the legal perspective in the area of Bollywood.

Celebrity Management companies like-Kwan, Krossover Entertainment sign actors. They also get actors a brand endorsement. But they look into every other aspect of the celebrity’s personality. They monetize their personality and make them brands too.

An actor is not only the one who acts in a film but a multi-faceted personality and public figure. This entails him to get more projects in the future. However, shouldn’t actors’ contracts be actually examined closely by celeb managers? If they are making actors’ assets, aren’t they responsible for maintaining the assets?

SSR Death Blow: The Probe Trends

Recently, Sanjay Leela Bhansali, the filmmaker, was also summoned by the police in the actor’s case. The probe revealed that due to the unavailability of dates, the actor was not cast in his films. Earlier, the police had also asked for the actor’s contracts with YRF productions. The post-mortem report also confirms the cause of death to be asphyxia. Even the cloth which the actor used to hang himself will undergo a tensile strength test. Amidst the increased controversies, one should note that the abetment to suicide angle is intensifying. What urges people to think that the case might be linked to abetment to suicide?

Advocate Sudhir Kumar Ojha has registered an FIR at Bihar. The FIR was lodged under Sections 306, 109, 504, and 506 of IPC. The main crux of the FIR revolves around abetment to suicide. Under Section 306, the element of instigation and positive acts become significant. In other words, the overt acts by the abettors must leave the accused with no other option but to die.

Would career destruction suffice as an instigation leading someone to commit suicide? The dots can only be connected after the investigation gets completed. Moreover, the beyond reasonable doubt parameter in criminal law is an escape route. Looking at alternative career options the actor had, will alleged abettors get through?

Celebrity Management Companies: Are they Miserably Failing?

Celebrity Management Business is a full-fledged business with a cost and revenue model. These companies help the actors manage their PR activities along with the movie projects. The sources of revenue are functions, social media, and appearances. Performances and other investment ventures also serve as a revenue source. Once an actor avails these companies, these act as agencies to monetize opportunities. They act as their gatekeepers. Generally, launch platforms sub-license the contracts to specialists such as these companies. Legal contracts are also flouted under the garb of affordability.

Hence, for an actor, simple contracts with a legal team engaged to look into the terms is a must. Termination and Force-Majeure clause are two essential clauses to look at. Agencies focus on increasing revenue in the short-term. Hence, the long- term strategy should remain in the house. There should be an employee who liaisons on the actor’s behalf with agencies. These companies should focus on a few actors but with a long-term strategic focus.

Contingent Clauses in Artist Agreements: Are Production Houses Exercising Monopoly?

Actors work ardently while doing movie projects. At times, it has a lasting impact on their day to day lives. For instance, Sushant Singh Rajput had trained himself rigorously for 9 months to play the role of M.S. Dhoni.

Another instance is actor Ranveer Singh isolating himself for 21 days. He did this while preparing for Alauddin Khiljii’s role in Padmavat. Actor Ranveer Singh had also consulted a psychiatrist. This was because he was still into his role days after the Padmavat shooting ended. Veteran Actor Mr. Shah Rukh Khan met a lot of people suffering from Asperger’s Syndrome for My Name is Khan. He practiced autism even at home during the shoot. Actors are putting in their heart and soul for movie projects. Is it fair for production houses to have arbitrary bargaining power?

An actor’s agreement has a lot of pertinent clauses relating to salary, bonus, looks of the actor. It may also contain clauses of exclusivity and working hours. Non-disclosure clauses forbidding actors to disclose movie themes are also written. If one talks about SSR’s case, the actor had a three-movie contract with YRF. According to media reports, the actor was to get a particular amount for the first movie. However, if the first movie is a hit, he would get double and if not, he would get a lesser amount. Depending on this, they would decide his acting stance in the third movie. What is a hit and what is a flop, is again the production houses’ discretion.

Contingent contracts are well permitted under Sections 31 – 36 of the Indian Contract Act. Yet, the event’s contingency is too subjective at times as in this case. Hence, a need for monitoring by celeb management companies is felt.

The SSR Case Aftermath: What Major Drafting Changes Should Celeb Contracts Undergo?

Simpler contracts with clear details of events of termination are essential. Force Majeure clauses also need necessary attention. Contingent events giving subjective discretion to production houses must not get incorporated. Celeb management companies should act as their monitoring bodies. An IP perspective for securing the actor’s rights is also significant in such cases. According to Ms. Deepika Chhangani, an IP Professor at NMIMS School of Law:

“Structured clauses for royalty sharing, keeping in mind the revenue model must get embodied. At times, Copyright law does not talk about royalty sharing mechanisms. Some leeway for image rights of the movie will also help strengthen the actor’s bargaining power. Additional remuneration, for social media promotion before release, can also give some clarity. The compensation clause for the rescission of contracts must get an analysis check. As then the actor loses his brand value.”

If clarity in drafting persists, diligent actors can never lose their share, even as they bargain terms with production houses.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Supreme Court Asks Petitioner to Approach Bombay High Court in PIL for CBI Probe in Disha Salian Case

On the 26th of October 2020, the Apex Court heard the PIL praying for a CBI probe into the death of Disha Salian. The...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -