India’s Myanmar Operation: An Insight into the Cross-border Raid signaling a Strong Intent

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

Follow us

On 9th June, 2015 a befitting response by the Indian government marked its place in history, and has proved to be a bench mark for the rest of the world. It elucidated the new stand of the country on counter terrorism slash insurgency measures sending out a strong message that now the time has arrived when India would no longer continue to remain soft target. This response, was a covert military operation in Myanmar, which was a jolt from the India, to the insurgent groups operating in the North-Easter part of the country. Very first of its kind that has remained as headlines across the country, it highlighted the dawn of an era, where India would not tolerate anyone infringing its sovereignty.

This operation was in retaliation to the attack on 4th June, 2015 by the insurgent group called the National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN) on the Indian Army. In this attack, approximately 18 army personals had died and 11 others were wounded, who served in the 6 Dogra Regiment, this being the biggest blow to the Indian army in the last 20 years. It was for the first time that an insurgent group had used rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs) in an attack. This attack happened in the new Samtal area of the Chandel district in Manipur, which is approximately at a distance of 15-20 kms from the India-Myanmar border.

Following this attack on 5th June, a highly classified meeting was called in, at which the present Home Minister, Mr. Rajnath Singh, Defense Minister Mr. Manohar Parikar, Army Commander Mr. Dalbir Suhag and National Security Advisor Mr. Ajeet Dowal participated and showed green to the initiation of a covert operation. It was for this classified meeting and the subsequent preparations that were to be made that Mr. Suhag and Mr. Dowal had skipped their scheduled visits to the United Kingdom and Bangladesh, respectively. Army Commander made visits to Manipur for the supervision of the training of the commandoes taking part in the operation. On the other hand, National Security Advisor had followed Prime Minister’s command and had ensure a ‘swift attack’ on the proclaimed target. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Satellite Imagery were being utilized for conducting this operation. Search operations by the army were consequently conducted so as to track down the militants involved in the attack, and their ultimate finding was the location of the NCSN near to the border, within the Myanmarese territory. This mission was severely a critical one and a single mistake would have resulted in jeopardizing the entire mission and thereby deteriorating India’s position on strengthening the motivations of the hostile groups.

Before, the D-day on 8th June, commandoes were deployed at the Nagaland-Manipur junction of the Indian-Myanmar junction with the help of the helicopters flown by the Indian Air Force (IAF) and the target being the two militant camps located approximately 5 kms inside the Myanmar border. These camps were situated at the Ponyu/Kemphu and Aungzeya areas, which in turn was a home to various militants’ camps.

On 9th June, the army personnel trekked through the heavy jungles to the location of these militant camps and carried the operation without any disruptions. As per the independent sources, the militant group was surprised by the nature of the attack and did not have the time to respond to the perfectly planned military operation and as a result, their nest at Myanmar’s border was breached, which was believed to be an impossible task for Indian Military.

The actual operation took about 45 minutes resulting in zero casualties on the Indian side. This was an operation, which was performed efficiently with minimal scope for the militants to respond to this line of course. As per the Official statements, which was declared by the government, around 50 militants were killed in this operation whereas as per the other media sources, it was claimed that around 100 deaths had been asserted. However the details regarding these were still uncertain.

This operation witnessed mixed reactions from all the corners of the nation and also opened a bundle of windows for the raised eyebrows and applause. The Indian Government’s machinery stated this as an operation which had strengthened the pillars of sovereignty of the country while on the flipside argued that Myanmar’s stand of denial of any such operation being carried out on its land and its condemnation of the operations of foreign attackers disturbing its neighboring countries had cost India its friendly relations with the neighboring country however pointing out zero tolerance towards terror.

Several Ministerial statements following this mission in Myanmar by the Indian Army have clarified that any activity going on in the border States that could adversely affect the safety, security and national integrity of India will be not be ignored and would be met out with a firm response.

One has to ponder upon the fact that such responses are highly political in nature that could cause turmoil in the international relations that India has maintained since time immemorial. On a concluding note, it must be realized that international cooperation has always been the key for resolution of concerns and therefore an effective and detailed scrutiny is called for with regard to such decisions that could possibly hamper and halt the peaceful coexistence with the neighbors that has remained fragile for a long span of time.

Latest News

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -