GAJENDRA SINGH SUICIDE SAGA: WHO IS TO BLAME?

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

Follow us

The recently elected Delhi government, the AamAadmi Party (AAP) has come under severe criticism from the media, opposition as well as certain supporters. The incident that led to this wide spread beleaguering of the party was the suicide of a farmer, named Gajendra Singh, in one of the AAP’s rallies against the land bill. Neither the police nor the party volunteers could do enough to save the farmer and then, as is so well familiar with Indian politics, the blame game began.

The First Information Report (F.I.R.) was filed in the case by the Delhi policewherein they accused the AAP and its leader for obstructing the efforts to save the farmer. The F.I.R. charged the party u/s 306of the I.P.C. for abetment to suicide as the party workers continued to clap and ‘incite’ the farmer as he tried to hang himself and also under sections of the I.P.C. relating to obstructing the public servant in discharge of their duty as the party workers did not allow the emergency vehicles or the fire brigades to pass even after requests from the police. The police also in its preliminary report to Home Minister, Rajnath Singh had alleged that the party had tried to delay the post mortem (the preliminary medical report based on the autopsy later stated that the death of the farmer was due to the hanging.)

However Under s.174 of the Cr.P.C. it has been provided that it is not necessary for the police to carry out post mortem report with the government’s permission therefore the post mortem could have been done even without the AAP’s permission and therefore the claim of the police that the government delayed the post mortem intentionally is mere untenable excuse.

However on the defence to AAP there has been a video showing that the party’s member Kumar Vishwas asking the farmer to come down and talk to the party chief, ArvindKejriwal, about his problems. The video further went on to show that Kumar Vishwas even asked the Delhi police personnels to bring the farmer down.

Further the question arises as to whether the incident could be brought under the definition of Criminal Negligence as claimed by M.A.Naqvi, Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs as clearly there was negligence on the part of the party as it is almost close to impossible to believe that with so many party volunteers on the spot they could not have prevented the incident.

What is more hair raising and perhaps nothing short of enraging is the fact that the death might just have been a political drama which went wrong.

As claimed by Megha, Gajendra Singh’ daughter that the handwriting on the suicide note is not of her father and she further alleged that her father was never ready to take such an extreme step hence an investigation team has been sent to Gajendra Singh’s native place, NangalJhamarwada village in Dausa District of Rajasthan and a handwriting check will also be conducted to verify if the handwriting is indeed of Gajendra Singh. Furthermore the so called suicide note had no mention of any plans to commit suicide. Digging deeper into the life of Gajendra Singh it was found out that he was a trader of a turban and a “part-time farmer” and a pretty affluent one. He had a spacious six-room concrete building, his family too was financially sound owning 50bigha land, his brothers were all fully employed and his uncle a sarpanch of the village. All these clearly negate the fact that he might have been having financial problem and that this season’s crop damage might have been the reason for is suicide.

The police have also sent notice to the AAP organisers and the party leaders will be questioned on the suicide incident. This notice comes after the farmer’s brother made a shocking allegation that Gajendra Singh was in touch with Manish Sisodia, Delhi’s Deputy Chief Minister.

The questions which subsequently arises are that was this a political stunt byGajendra Singh, to come into notice of the AAP leaders and become a larger leader, which went wrong as Gajendra Singh is known to have previous political affiliation and has even participated in the elections twice but failed, Or was he used merely as political pawn by another party as a part of a bigger conspiracy? Furthermore why did the party continue with the speeches even after the incident?

While the nation would want answers to these questions the problem of delay doesn’t seem to end here. While the AAP had ordered a magisterial probe into the incident the Delhi Police seems to have other plans and Mr. B.S. Bassi, Delhi Police Chief has clearly told that the District Magistrate has no jurisdiction in the incident and the police would be conducting its own probe and that the case has been handed over to the crime branch for further investigation.

While the government might have paid the due compensation and offered jobs to Gajendra Singh’s family but what has been brought out in the open is the tussle between the government and the police. Then again suicide by farmers has become so rampant that they are not even sensational enough to be on the cover page anymore (save this incident).

The real party to be blamed for this incident is non-other than the Indian political system itself. How effectively and vehemently the death of farmers and their plight have been politicised in the country is worthy of mentioning for all the wrong reasons. None of the leaders or party has been bold enough to take the blame for the poor state of the farmers, no one seems to bat an eye to the fact that agriculture is still the field where the maximum percentage of our workforce is employed, that agriculture is the backbone of the nation’s economy and needs to be much more developed than it is at present or atleast developed enough not to force farmers into committing suicide. Instead of providing any real alternative to the problem at hand the only thing our so called leaders, elected leaders to be precise, has done effectively has to point how each of the party is to be blamed for the incident. Clearly the nation has enough reasons to blame all the parties and the political system in the nation as a whole while wondering will any government ever wake up to such serious issues and actively part take in solving it or will the trend of picking up vital issues continue only for the purpose maligning the party in power.

Latest News

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

[HUL – Sebamed Ad War] Bombay High Court Passed Injunction; Permits Sebamed Ad Against HUL’s Dove

The ad war between the German personal care brand Sebamed and the consumer goods giant Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) has come to an end. On January 19th, Bombay High Court passed an injunction order permitting the Sebamed ad against Hindustan Unilever’s Dove without any changes. It was observed that Sebamed ads were backed with evidence-based data. However, Sebamed was ordered to put an end to its advertisement that compared HUL soap bars Lux, Pears, and Santoor with Rin and detergent category.

Bombay High Court Says White Collar Crimes Are More Dangerous Than Murder and Dacoity

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court rejected 4 petitions of 4 businessmen after observing that white-collar crimes are more serious than murder and dacoity. The businesspersons were booked for fraud of evading GST by producing fake invoices.

Right To Protection Can’t Be Granted To Married Woman Involved in Live-in Relationship: Allahabad High Court

The Bench of Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition of a live-in couple, observing that a married woman in a live-in relationship is not entitled to any sort of legal protection whatsoever. The Court remarked that they are adults and should live as ‘husband and wife’ if they want no one to interfere in their lives.

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

Women Advocates Move To Supreme Court Against the Delhi HC Orders on Resuming Physical Hearing

Another writ petition has been filed by women advocates in the Supreme Court against the decision of the Delhi HC of directing the expansion of physical hearing of cases within the National Capital Territory of Delhi without giving an option to litigants to be represented by their lawyers virtually.

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus. The petition sought to direct...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -