GAJENDRA SINGH SUICIDE SAGA: WHO IS TO BLAME?

Must Read

Explained: The Scope of Article 21 During the Era of COVID-19

“One’s right to self, their body, their health, and their livelihoods is inherent to living a meaningful human life, Human...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

The Competition Law Regime and Re-Tooling Patent Pools In India

The adversity to acquire licenses of various patented technologies can thwart the commercialization as well as the development of...

Solving Healthcare Issues Using Blockchain Technology

In troubled times that follow a pandemic, almost all nations are forced to take stock of the gaps present...

Follow us

The recently elected Delhi government, the AamAadmi Party (AAP) has come under severe criticism from the media, opposition as well as certain supporters. The incident that led to this wide spread beleaguering of the party was the suicide of a farmer, named Gajendra Singh, in one of the AAP’s rallies against the land bill. Neither the police nor the party volunteers could do enough to save the farmer and then, as is so well familiar with Indian politics, the blame game began.

The First Information Report (F.I.R.) was filed in the case by the Delhi policewherein they accused the AAP and its leader for obstructing the efforts to save the farmer. The F.I.R. charged the party u/s 306of the I.P.C. for abetment to suicide as the party workers continued to clap and ‘incite’ the farmer as he tried to hang himself and also under sections of the I.P.C. relating to obstructing the public servant in discharge of their duty as the party workers did not allow the emergency vehicles or the fire brigades to pass even after requests from the police. The police also in its preliminary report to Home Minister, Rajnath Singh had alleged that the party had tried to delay the post mortem (the preliminary medical report based on the autopsy later stated that the death of the farmer was due to the hanging.)

However Under s.174 of the Cr.P.C. it has been provided that it is not necessary for the police to carry out post mortem report with the government’s permission therefore the post mortem could have been done even without the AAP’s permission and therefore the claim of the police that the government delayed the post mortem intentionally is mere untenable excuse.

However on the defence to AAP there has been a video showing that the party’s member Kumar Vishwas asking the farmer to come down and talk to the party chief, ArvindKejriwal, about his problems. The video further went on to show that Kumar Vishwas even asked the Delhi police personnels to bring the farmer down.

Further the question arises as to whether the incident could be brought under the definition of Criminal Negligence as claimed by M.A.Naqvi, Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs as clearly there was negligence on the part of the party as it is almost close to impossible to believe that with so many party volunteers on the spot they could not have prevented the incident.

What is more hair raising and perhaps nothing short of enraging is the fact that the death might just have been a political drama which went wrong.

As claimed by Megha, Gajendra Singh’ daughter that the handwriting on the suicide note is not of her father and she further alleged that her father was never ready to take such an extreme step hence an investigation team has been sent to Gajendra Singh’s native place, NangalJhamarwada village in Dausa District of Rajasthan and a handwriting check will also be conducted to verify if the handwriting is indeed of Gajendra Singh. Furthermore the so called suicide note had no mention of any plans to commit suicide. Digging deeper into the life of Gajendra Singh it was found out that he was a trader of a turban and a “part-time farmer” and a pretty affluent one. He had a spacious six-room concrete building, his family too was financially sound owning 50bigha land, his brothers were all fully employed and his uncle a sarpanch of the village. All these clearly negate the fact that he might have been having financial problem and that this season’s crop damage might have been the reason for is suicide.

The police have also sent notice to the AAP organisers and the party leaders will be questioned on the suicide incident. This notice comes after the farmer’s brother made a shocking allegation that Gajendra Singh was in touch with Manish Sisodia, Delhi’s Deputy Chief Minister.

The questions which subsequently arises are that was this a political stunt byGajendra Singh, to come into notice of the AAP leaders and become a larger leader, which went wrong as Gajendra Singh is known to have previous political affiliation and has even participated in the elections twice but failed, Or was he used merely as political pawn by another party as a part of a bigger conspiracy? Furthermore why did the party continue with the speeches even after the incident?

While the nation would want answers to these questions the problem of delay doesn’t seem to end here. While the AAP had ordered a magisterial probe into the incident the Delhi Police seems to have other plans and Mr. B.S. Bassi, Delhi Police Chief has clearly told that the District Magistrate has no jurisdiction in the incident and the police would be conducting its own probe and that the case has been handed over to the crime branch for further investigation.

While the government might have paid the due compensation and offered jobs to Gajendra Singh’s family but what has been brought out in the open is the tussle between the government and the police. Then again suicide by farmers has become so rampant that they are not even sensational enough to be on the cover page anymore (save this incident).

The real party to be blamed for this incident is non-other than the Indian political system itself. How effectively and vehemently the death of farmers and their plight have been politicised in the country is worthy of mentioning for all the wrong reasons. None of the leaders or party has been bold enough to take the blame for the poor state of the farmers, no one seems to bat an eye to the fact that agriculture is still the field where the maximum percentage of our workforce is employed, that agriculture is the backbone of the nation’s economy and needs to be much more developed than it is at present or atleast developed enough not to force farmers into committing suicide. Instead of providing any real alternative to the problem at hand the only thing our so called leaders, elected leaders to be precise, has done effectively has to point how each of the party is to be blamed for the incident. Clearly the nation has enough reasons to blame all the parties and the political system in the nation as a whole while wondering will any government ever wake up to such serious issues and actively part take in solving it or will the trend of picking up vital issues continue only for the purpose maligning the party in power.

Latest News

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -