Even Capital Punishment for Rape Is Insufficient, What Can India Do To Bring Change?

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

Follow us

Rape is the only crime where the victim becomes the accused.                                                                                                                     -Freda Adler

Introduction

Society has always counted rape as one of the most heinous crimes. ‘Rape’ as a defined offence was first introduced in the Indian Penal Code in 1860. Rape is currently defined in Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code. Throughout the years, the legislature has passed various amendments to strengthen the law. But have these helped prevent or combat rape?

The answer is right in our faces. The latest data by the National Crime Record Bureau (NCRB) states that rape is more common than murder. The crime rate for murder stands at 2.2 while that for rape is 5.2.

Over the years, various rape cases have sparked outrage throughout the country. The Delhi gang-rape case of 2012 is the one that springs to mind immediately. This case shook the nation to its very core. Following the outrage, the Government announced that the death penalty for rapists. This would be applicable to those convicted of rape, resulting in death. But has this deterred rape in any way?

Capital Punishment in India

The death penalty has always been a contentious issue in India. It finds its place in the Indian Penal Code (1860) and the Code of Criminal Procedure (1973). The CRPC states that the Sessions Court can give the death penalty. However, it is subject to confirmation of the High Court and the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, in Bachan Singh vs State of Punjab laid down the ‘rarest of rare’ doctrine. According to this doctrine, capital punishment must be given only in the rarest cases. The option of life imprisonment in these cases must be ‘unquestionably foreclosed’.

Since independence, 720 people have been given the death penalty in India. In most cases, the Court has given the death penalty to acts of terrorism or mass murders. But, since 2012, the focus has shifted to sexual offences as well. There is an increase in sentiment that rapists deserve the death penalty. Keeping this in mind, the legislature has passed various amendments. These widen the ambit of capital punishment and include sexual offences.

Capital Punishment concerning rape

Rape laws have evolved in our country. The legislature has amended Section 375 many times to widen the definition of rape. Although the changes did come a little too late, for 100 years, the criminal law relating to sexual assault remained unchanged. It changed with the case of Tuka Ram and Anr vs State Of Maharashtra. This judgment was quite controversial. It was the precursor to the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 1983. The Amendment inserted a new Section 114A in the Indian Evidence Act of 1872. It stated that the absence of consent in certain prosecutions is rape if the victim says so.

The next significant Amendment came after the 2012 Delhi gang-rape case. The national outcry after this case forced the Government into action. They passed the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act in 2013. It widened the definition of rape and made punishment more stringent. The Act increased jail terms in most sexual assault cases. The death penalty would be applicable to people convicted of rape more than once. It also provided for the death penalty in rape cases that cause the death of the victim. This was also applicable in cases where the crime left the victim in a vegetative state.

Sexual offences against minors have also gained importance in recent times. The brutal gang rape of an eight-year-old in Jammu shocked the country. Post this, the legislature passed the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018. The Amendment allowed for the death penalty for rape of a girl under 12 years and increased the minimum punishment to 20 years in jail.

Have these Amendments helped deter rape?

Most people have welcomed the various amendments passed by the Government. Slapping the death penalty for rape has done nothing but satisfy people’s bloodlust. There is ample evidence available that capital punishment does not reduce crime. Even after passing these stringent laws, the number of rapes has only increased. There has been a 1000 case increase in the number of rapes per year between 2017 and 2018. Rape-murders have also increased from 223 to 294.

The 262nd Law Commission Report has also stated that implementing the death penalty will not deter rapes. It recommended that the death penalty be abolished for all crimes. The only exceptions should be terrorism-related offences and waging war.

A committee, headed by Justice JS Verma, examined the efficiency of the death penalty for rape. The report stated that prescribing the death penalty for rape was of no use. There was a lack of correlation in the usage of death penalty and the prevention of rape or gang-rape.

Rape laws in foreign jurisdictions

So what are the rape laws in other countries? Do other countries hand out the death penalty as well?

Many developed countries do not prescribe the death penalty for rape. It includes the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Sweden, and Germany. All these countries provide for life imprisonment as the maximum sentence. These countries have more successful convictions compared to developing countries. They also have a higher case registration ratio.

Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan all hand out the death penalty for rape. These countries argue that stringent punishment will deter people from committing the Act. However, experts say that this deters the system from handing out convictions. Though rape is treated at par with terrorism, conviction rates remain low. They believe that conviction is a more critical determent than the death penalty.

What does India need to do?

Currently, India is one of the few countries around the world that has the death penalty for rape. There have been clear statistics and legal opinions from various experts. Despite this, the legislature is not ready to pay heed to the actual issue. The actual issue that the Government needs to resolve is the problem of low conviction. Indian society still has a culture of victim-shaming. Yet, the legislature does not want to address this issue.

Rape convictions are dismally low because of the rape culture in our country. In many cases, police tend to broker compromises. They encourage survivors, under threat or coercion, to withdraw their complaints. The gruesome trail process also does not help rape victims in any way.

What India needs is a supportive system. A system that does not shame rape victims. A system that fights the battle against rape not by handing out excessive punishments, but by ensuring better reporting of cases and higher levels of conviction.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus. The petition sought to direct...

Gujarat High Court Directs To Register Name of Petitioners in the Society Records as Owners of Property, as per Will

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that the petitioners were entitled to...

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there is no requirement of passing...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -