Does Dress Code Still Matter When Court Proceedings Move Online?

Must Read

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

Follow us

Lawyers should wear appropriate dress code while attending court proceedings. Ever since the Court proceedings moved online, few lawyers are drifting from the rules. 

COVID-19’s Impact on Court Proceedings

COVID-19 has affected almost everything in the world. The same goes for Judicial Services. It has done something that the judges and lawyers could not do in ages. The colonial legacy of wearing black coats and robes to the Supreme Court. This happened during a virtual court proceeding. The CJI and justices Indu Malhothra and Hrishikesh Roy were not wearing robes or coats. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal noticed this and requested to know why. The medical advisers say that virus sticks to the surfaces of gowns. They also conveyed that they wish to extend this to the lawyers as well.  

The medical advisers say that virus sticks to the surfaces of gowns. Supreme Court issued a notification. This notification, allows judges and lawyers to appear in a white shirt and lawyers band.      

Following this, BCI issued a notice applying same to advocates all over the country. 

Various Related Instances

In a case under the Rajasthan High Court, the petitioner appeared in his vest. Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma immediately adjourned the proceedings. According to him, “The counsel for the petitioner was contacted through video-conferencing. He was wearing a banian (vest). The court’s decorum required to be maintained even through video-conferencing.”

Further, the Court said that it has been observing that few lawyers are deferring from the rules. The court took into account a case that adjourned due to similar circumstances.  

A lady advocate appeared in the Jharkhand High Court in casual attire. The lady advocate reprimanded by the bench and Advocates Association. This led to the Advocates Association issuing a notice for all advocates to appear in proper attire. 

BCI’s Order

The BCI issued a notice relaxing the dress code. The Chairman of BCI, Rajendra Kumar expressed his dismay over the matter.  

A lawyer appeared in a virtual hearing in the Supreme Court while lying on bed and wearing a T-shirt. The judge drawing displeasure said that “minimum court etiquette” should be there.  Taking into account that the hearing is of public nature.  The Apex Court said that advocates appearing via video conference should be presentable. They should avoid showing images that are inappropriate.

“We are all passing through trying times and hearings by virtual courts has become an order of the day. Yet minimum court etiquette in terms of what can be considered decent dress, background, etc should be followed, given the public nature of the hearings,” the Apex Court said.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -