Dilomatic Immunity And The Corrupt Practice BY The Diplomats

Must Read

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

The Competition Law Regime and Re-Tooling Patent Pools In India

The adversity to acquire licenses of various patented technologies can thwart the commercialization as well as the development of...

Follow us

Taking note of the diplomatic tussle between Saudi Arabia and India, every Indian is preoccupied with the thought as to whether diplomatic immunity gives them license to commit the crime.

After the alleged rape of the Nepali women by a diplomat of Saudi Arabia, it is felt that now the time has come when the world should ponder over the Diplomatic Immunity given. Diplomatic Immunity is one of the foundational agreements of modern international relations, where one country ensures another that their representatives will not be prosecuted and in lieu of that, the other country representatives get the reciprocal treatment. The recent public outrage started after the alleged rape of two Nepali women by a Saudi Arabian diplomat, in which the wives’ of the diplomats and others are also accused of various offences. But unfortunately, the Government’s hands were tied because of the immunity granted to them.

Under Article 31 of Vienna Convention 1961, Diplomats and their family members enjoy immunity from criminal prosecution. In addition to that, Article 29 of the Vienna Convention provides them with further safeguards, by protecting them from any form of arrest or detention and by putting an obligation on the receiving State to take all appropriate steps to prevent attack on this person, his freedom or dignity.

Though this diplomatic immunity can be waived by the nation State but in reality, they never do so. Second action the nation State can exercise is that they can try the diplomats after they return to their native soil but this also happens very rarely and even if it is done, then the chances of conducting a fair trial are very low.

After all the allegations against that diplomat were denied by Saudi Arabia and an official complaint had been registered by the embassy against the police raid on the breach of diplomatic privilege, the only option that was left was to declare him persona non grata. A person so declared is no longer welcome in that country and is usually forced to return to his or her native country. 

The notions of diplomatic immunity were introduced in order to ensure the safety of diplomats against any arbitrary State action. But now, it has been used by the diplomats as the safety tool where they commit serious crimes and then hide behind the wall of diplomatic immunity. It is odious that international conventions which were formed to protect and enforce the human rights are invoked by the diplomats to violate the same.

In the name of ensuring protection to the diplomats we cannot forget our obligation to protect victims of violence regardless of who the perpetrators are. Time has come when the governments should work together to ensure the plausible prosecutions of diplomats who are involved in such heinous crimes.

The concept is essentially meant to enable diplomats to do their jobs, protect their rights and defend themselves from hostile actions or pressure from the host country. But that should not prove to become a license for crime like it happened in the present case.

Latest News

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -