Did The Nation Vote For Minority Oppression? – A look into the recent attacks on the Christians in India

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

Follow us

“Gandhi would be shocked by religious intolerance in India” 

-Obama

Christians make up a small part of the nation’s vast population and of late they seem to have come to face with a challenge of religious extremism in the form anti-Christian violence. By anti-Christian violence one generally tends to refer to religiously motivated attacks on the Christians, who are a minority in the nation, in the form of arson of churches, burning bibles, raping nuns, forceful conversion amongst other things.

However, this phenomenon is not new to the nation and seems to be intertwined with the ruling, Hindu Nationalist, Bharatiya Janata Party (B.J.P.) government. According to a Human Rights Watch report the offences against Christians had shown an upward trend in the recent months after the victory of the B.J.P. in 1998. And now just when the nation seemed to have voted for “ache din” by electing the B.J.P. government with a whooping majority it seemed to be a déjà vu of the Christian oppression of 1998.

Since 2014, that is after the new government took office, there has been an increase in anti-Christian violence again. The violence has been in the form of attack in several churches in the National Capital, Delhi since December 2014, which included the burning of the St. Sebastian’s Church, a church in Mangalore was attacked in February, an under construction church was vandalised in Haryana, St. George church in Mumbai was attacked by masked persons, the cathedral of Jabalpur was attacked and more than a dozen people were injured and perhaps the most outrageous of this series of attacks was the gang rape of a 71 year old nun in West Bengal during an attack on a convent school. Further this incident came just after a week when Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) alleged that the charitable work of Mother Teresa (whose charitable works are considered more than a legacy)  to be religiously motivated by aiming to convert those whom she helped to Christianity.

It is interesting to note that a report – “100 days under the New Regime- the state of minorities” – was released at a protest, on 27th September, by leaders of Christian denominations, Muslims and social activists and it pointed out that there have been more than 600 attacks on the minorities since the landslide victory. The report pointed out that “the first 100 days of the new regime have, however, seen the rising pitch of a crescendo of hate speech against Muslims and Christians. Their identity derided, their patriotism scoffed at, their citizenship questioned, their faith mocked.” The statement further noted that, “The environment has degenerated into one of coercion divisiveness, and suspicion. This has percolated to small towns and villages of rural India, severing bonds forged in a dialogue of life over the centuries, shattering the harmony built around the messages of peace and brotherhood.”

Though it is only logical for anything that goes wrong with the nation the ruling party is put under the axe but in this case the situation is likely to bring much more condemnation to the ruling party than any other lapses, the reason being that major accused perpetrators of anti-Christian violence have been the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP), Bajrang Dal, and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), these are organisations with extreme Hindu beliefs and furthermore they very strongly endorse the B.J.P. claiming that the party too believes in the same (extreme) ideology of Hindutva. This is more than a mere allegation and is very well substantiated with facts when we look into the ruling governments in Gujarat, Orissa, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Karnataka that there were serious lapses in handling the violence against the minorities and the B.J.P. was found directly responsible for allowing the bloodshed to spread.

Adding more to the allegations, as New York Times aptly put it, there was a “dangerous silence” by Mr.Modi, who is also known for his gift of the gab, giving rise to the feeling that either he cannot or he chose not to address the fringe elements of the Hindu nationalism. However he broke the silence by stating that his government “will not allow any religious group, belonging to the majority or the minority, to incite hatred against others, overtly or covertly.” This though welcomed by certain sects of the society as “better late than never” but on the other hand there was apprehension amongst others on the grounds as to why he decided to speak up after such a long break- whether it was out of genuine conviction or rather out helplessness or pressure, then again, there was a leader who most often addresses in Hindi speaking in English, so was it more for the global audience rather than the domestic audience.

The B.J.P. government has clearly not learnt its lesson from the past and to a large extent still appears to be a Hindu party rather than a secular one. One needs to maybe take back this government to almost two and a half decade back to the time when the B.J.P. government was dismissed in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Himachal Pradesh in the wake of the Ayodhya incident on Dec.6,1992 and the landmark judgement of S.R.Bommai V. Union of India was pronounced wherein the 9-judge bench of the Hon’ble Supreme had reminded this same party that ‘secularism’ is a basic feature of the constitution and that no political party can simultaneously be a political party as well as a religious party.

In the given situation of already existing religious intolerance in the country the government cannot add to the perpetuation of this problem and needs to wake up to its promise of development, in terms of religion too, and needs to strongly condemn the perpetrators of religious crimes rather than being mute or remotely vocal on the subject. The fact that it has been entrusted with power in the center with a majority in the recently concluded election only shows that the people of the nation i.e. the Indians and not simply the Hindus have entered into a contract and entrusted them to uphold the peace and integrity of the nation and lead the nation on the path to development.

Latest News

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -