Declassification of Netaji’s Files

Must Read

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Follow us

It has now become common knowledge that history is always written to please the government in power. Certain leaders from the freedom struggle have been eulogized while several others ignored. This has eventually not gone down well with the masses. One such “Forgotten Hero” was Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose. Perhaps no other leader has created as much controversy as Netaji did before and after his death, with his death being the key to all the controversy.

The Khosla Commission reported that Netaji died at Tethoku airfield in Taipeh (Formosa), currently in Taiwan on 18 August 1945, due to the third degree burns that occurred from the flight crash. After this was reported, the Justice Mukherjee Commission of Inquiry (JMCI) raised many eyebrows when it almost conclusively held that there was no reported airplane crash on the day on which Netaji was alleged to have breathed his last.

The mass movement for declassifying files in relation to Netaji became a global event in 2015. The movement gained further momentum and the Central Government was put under humongous pressure when the Trinamool Congress Government under the aegis of Ms. Mamata Banerjee released 64 documents related to Netaji, on 18th September 2015, and challenged the Central Government to do the same. The Modi government did what none of its predecessors had dared to do and promised to release, declassify and digitalize, all files available with the government related to Netaji and also take up the matter with other nations to release documents related to Netaji and the INA. The process of declassifying the files began on January 23, 2016 to mark and honor Netaji’s birthday in probably the most apt manner possible.

However, before delving into details of the declassification, it is necessary to have a background into the controversy surrounding the leader’s sudden disappearance.  Apart from the fact that the cause of the death or the death itself is not convincingly proved, what many supporters of Netaji ask is whether it was the Indian National Congress which had a role to play in the death. Many Congress leaders were opposed to Netaji for his constant confrontation with Gandhiji under the garb of what they believed was Japanese Fascism, and this mood was succinctly expressed in Gandhiji’s comment post Netaji’s disappearance where he said – “Subhas Bose has died well. He was undoubtedly a patriot, though misguided.

Further, as many claim, including Chandra Kumar Bose, the grand-nephew of Netaji, that Jawaharlal Nehru was apprehensive that Netaji, on account of being more popular than him, would automatically become the leader of the country when he returns and thus, would undermine Nehru. The claim is seemingly backed by the recent revelations after the declassification that Nehru did indeed spy on the Bose family, specifically Amiya Nath Bose. Amiya Nath was the closest nephew of Netaji. It would be conjecture however, the reasonable deduction to draw would be that Nehru’s apprehension could have led to the spying of Amiya, which would effectively imply that Netaji’s movement would be tracked. This was clearly a violation of the highest order, of the basic human right of privacy.

There have been some other startling revelations as well from the declassification, such as:

  • The British government did not really believe that Bose was dead. Even for some months after the Japanese announced Netaji’s death, the British government continued to discuss ways of ‘dealing with him’.
  • The Indian embassy in Tokyo pointed out that the temple authorities had a feeling that the Indian government was “indifferent” to its national hero who fought for the country’s independence.
  • According to a letter written by historian Peter Simkins, Netaji’s name was not in the British government’s list of war criminals but he was considered a traitor.
  • A letter (not authenticated) was purportedly written by Nehru to the then PM of England, Clement Attlee in which he termed Netaji as a ‘War Criminal”
  • Gandhiji himself did not believe that Netaji had died in the Taihoku crash and had asked Netaji’s family to not perform the Shradh.

All these revelations clearly point out to the fact that the UPA government was in some way or the other disinclined in disclosing the truth about our great national leader. The decision to reject the JMCI was purely based on political interest and the declassification of the files only proves that accepting JMCI’s report that Netaji did not die out of a plane crash would have caused problems that the UPA government was unwilling to face.

The JMCI overturned the reports of two previous committees formed to report on Netaji’s disappearance – The Shah Nawaz Committee (1956) and the GD Khosla Committee (1970-74) which were held to be contradictory and full of loopholes even by the Calcutta High Court.

“Shri Tarakeswar Pal, the learned senior counsel appearing for the government of India, fairly submitted that there were glaring discrepancies in the evidence adduced regarding the accident as also the date and time of death, news of death, death certificate and cremation of Netaji.” [JMCI Report, Vol 1, p 53]

At the end of its 6-year long investigation, the JMCI could not come to a conclusion on the whereabouts of the leader post 1945 and concluded that he is most likely not alive in 2005 as he would be over 100 years of age at that time. The government in one line rejected the ground breaking JMCI, the first inquiry to have held that the air crash incident was not the reason of Netaji’s death. It was only after 3 months in the Parliament, when faced with scathing criticism and pressure from the opposition with regard to Shivraj Patil (the then home minister) defending the rejection of the JMCI findings, that the Government chose to act in pursuance of demystifying the mystery around Netaji’s death. The rejection of the findings was based on flawed assumptions – one of which was that the other two committees were closer to the timeline than the JMCI and their findings were bound to be more accurate than that of the JMCI – this was said even after the Calcutta High Court had held the previous two reports to be filled with loopholes and to be contradictory.

Clearly, the previous government was hell bent upon not opening the Pandora’s Box of realities and wanted to remove the albatross from its neck once and for all, even if it was at the expense of the honor of one of the nation’s most beloved freedom fighters. However, that was not to be and the much appreciable step by the NDA government would now bring to a close, a major controversy in the history of India.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -