Atmanirbhar Bharat Package: What is it all about?

Must Read

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

The Competition Law Regime and Re-Tooling Patent Pools In India

The adversity to acquire licenses of various patented technologies can thwart the commercialization as well as the development of...

Solving Healthcare Issues Using Blockchain Technology

In troubled times that follow a pandemic, almost all nations are forced to take stock of the gaps present...

How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming the Legal Profession

In recent times, we have seen the introduction of artificial intelligence on a small yet phenomenally successful scale in...

Approaching the von Neumann Bottleneck: Neuromorphic Computing & beyond

“There are one trillion synapses in a cubic centimeter of the brain. If there is such a thing as...

Is India Truly Following the Footsteps of Mahatma Gandhi?

On October 2, 2020, it was the 151st birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi. India couldn’t celebrate it due to...

Follow us

On May 12, the Prime Minister announced the ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat Package’, valued at 20 lakh crore. The package’s announcement is based on certain legal provisions which empower the Government to provide such reliefs.

About the Package

The announcement comes in response to the biggest economic crisis since the one in 1979. The Prime Minister announced the ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’ package as a means to revive the economy. After the initial announcement, the Finance Minister elaborated on the package over the next few days. The Package comprises the following tranches, which are –

Tranche 1 (Announced on May 13):

Deals with economic relief to MSMEs, NBFCs, and DISCOMs.

Tranche 2 (Announced on May 14):

Provides for economic relief and food grain supply to Migrant workers.

Tranche 3 (Announced on May 15):

Provides relief for the agricultural sector, herbal cultivation, beekeeping, fisheries as well as for animal husbandry.

Tranche 4 (Announced on May 16):

Provides for Viability Gap Funding.

Tranche 5 (Announced on May 17):

Provides for additional MGNREGA Allocation.

The Union Cabinet has approved of the various schemes under the Package, including Tranches 1 and 2. In addition to the allocations, the borrowing limits of the states was increased from 3% to 5% for the year 2020-2021.

Legal Provisions relating to Atmanirbhar Bharat Package

The Package comes under the provisions for the Union Budget under the Constitution of India. The provisions dealing with the Union Budget are provided under Articles 112 to 117. Article 112 provides for the Annual Financial Statement, which contains the anticipated expenditures. Additionally, Article 113 lays down the procedure for the estimation of expenditure. Further, Article 114 elaborates upon the bills drafted for the appropriation of the Consolidated Fund of India.

Article 115 provides for “Supplementary, additional or excess grants”. It states that the President can present before the Parliament any expenditure. However, the government did not anticipate such expenditure while the Financial Statement was prepared. It allows for additional expenditures in the case of unforeseen circumstances. The Package falls under the concept of ‘Additional Grants’.

A new service not contemplated in the Budget for a particular year require additional grants. The demand for additional grants is made before the Parliament. Such grants are allowed only if it is proven that there will be additional expenditures.

Current Scenario

The Government of India announced Union Budget for the year 2020-2021 on February, 1.  “ Aspirational India, Economic Development, Caring Society” were its major themes.

The Prime Minister and the President approved the Union Budget and suspended the Budget session earlier. However, the current pandemic has resulted in a need for additional expenditures. However, the Parliament has suspended activities and the procedures for the passing of the Package could not be followed as per Article 115.

The cabinet will make decisions regarding the package if the parliament is not in session. It has given ex-post facto approval to certain allocations under the Package.

Views regarding Atmanirbhar Bharat Package

The people of our nation have exhibited varying responses to the announcement of the “Atmanirbhar Bharat Package”. According to one side, the package is beneficial to all parties suffering losses due to the pandemic. On the other hand, there are views that the amount is insufficient.

The Package is equal to 10% of the GDP to provide financial support during the Pandemic. The government will implement the various trenches of this package in stages. The media and the public are yet to note the practical effects of the package.

The government has introduced this package as a measure to bring about financial stability. Finally, while citizens have raised many questions against it, the government has placed immense faith in it. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

Chandigarh Housing Board Is Bound To Implement the Chandigarh Administration’s Policy Decision: Punjab & Haryana High Court

On 15th October 2020, Justices Jaswant Singh and Sant Parkash heard the case of Bhartendu Sood vs Chandigarh Housing Board & Anr., via video-conferencing. Deeming the...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of one year. The petitioners prayed...

Uttarakhand High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Relief for the Cancellation of Selection Process

On 13th October 2020, a Single Judge Bench of Hon'ble Justice Lok Pal Singh, heard the case of Ashish Bisht & Anr. v. State...

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against National Stock Exchange For Lack Of Merit

In the case of A. Kumar v. Financial Intelligence Unit & Ors., A. Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

The Federal Appeals Court Holds Trump’s Diversion of Military Funds To Build the Wall To Be Unlawful

The Federal Appeals Court held that US President Donald Trump’s diversion of military funds to build the wall is unlawful. A grey area in the...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -