An Obligation to Protect, Not Harm: Powers Enjoyed And Misused By the Police During Lockdown

Must Read

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

Follow us

If you want to know about how the police are punishing people, and whether these actions are legal and fair or not? Then this article will help you clarify the lawfulness of the police actions. In this article, we will talk about police powers during the lockdown and how they are further misused. Further, it will also deal with the legality of the same by citing a few cases. 

The Police and the Lockdown Period

Citizens are not permitted to move freely in the locality during the lockdown time. Therefore, it is the police’s responsibility to ensure that people stay inside their homes.If we take the lockdown in the “COVID-19” then the police were advised to provide reliable service. This Ought fo happen keeping in  mind the people, that is, whenever they needed support while conducting a sovereign role.

Police maintain an intrigued and interrogating mind during the performance of the sovereign duty. Police may prevent any person from venturing out during lockdown time. And may also use force on people and beat people who venture out in lockdown without proper cause. Beating people in such circumstances is permissible only in certain circumstances. When it goes beyond this limit of using force, then they show the abuse of governmental power.

The Code of Criminal Procedure frequently addresses the powers of police. And this can be further seen during a shutdown because of this coronavirus. Police may book any person found to be violating and misusing the law applicable. There are many cases in India where people were further denied access without a proper cause. Due to this people suffer in their day-to-day lives.

Before citing cases, the question arises- whether the police action is within the legal framework? Or we could say whether the police action is legal. Police action is lawful if they do use force but in a way that does not exceed the law like the police did in Kolkata. The sovereign function is lawful and reasonable, except to a certain degree. And when that degree is then exceeded in sovereign function, the act is further deemed to be unconstitutional.

Landmark Cases where access was further denied

In India v. Pakistan (Kulbhusan Jadhav),  India demanded consular access, however, the Pakistani military court declined to grant consular access. This was done without providing any enough reasons for consular access refusals. This instance shows the denial of access without giving any legit reason. 

Swapnil Tripathi v. Supreme Court of India, is a landmark case. In this case, a four-year law student lodged a plea in the SC to make the court proceedings live. This was further done in the public interest. So that students of law and lawyers could enjoy live telecasting. The SC held that the ability to watch live broadcast flowed from the constitutional right of access to justice. However, they said that certain guidelines should not be further provided for this right, and that it is at the court’s discretion when the live broadcast of the proceedings will be done.

Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka is a famous case of 1989. It occurred when the Karnataka government issued a notification allowing extra tuition fees to be further charged. This was only for students who came through the ‘Government Seat Quota.’ This decision was then challenged by Mohini Jain, who was a medical student. The SC raised a question “whether, under the Indian Constitution, the right to education is guaranteed to the Indian citizen.” For this, the Supreme Court held that the right to education should be further read as an integral part of the right to life which is guaranteed.

The Police abusing its Power

The issue of legality emerges whether the police action falls within the regulatory framework or not? The Government does not exceed or execute any action. Especially the one that exceeds the authority with which it was then provided.

There are some provisions, charges and punishments specified for stepping out during lockdown. The police exercise their power only by the provisions mentioned below. They act under the order of the legislative and judicial body. But some policemen are on the other side of the coin. They are exercise extra power under the name of sovereign function.

Police were further given power not to intimidate citizens in this quarantine. This was to provide the citizens with aid and utmost support, so that they can spend the duration of lockdown without having any problem. An incident happened in Kolkata where Policeman had misused his power. A person was going to buy milk. But the police beat him so much that he died. This incident is so shameful and horrific.

Some of the important provisions 

  • Section 188 IPC– Breach of any regulation issued by the government. This regulation is in the interest of the general public.
  • Section 269 IPC– Performing any act to spread the disease within the community.
  • Section 270 IPC– Doing activities that may lead to transmitting. Or say activities in which contamination from disease is more likely to occur.
  • Section 271 IPC– Knowingly disobeying the rules of the quarantine period.

As far as the complete description is needed, a Zomato delivery boy was beaten with cruelty. He was delivering the order in quarantine. The brutality is a clear misuse of their sovereign power. And their act is contradictory to the sovereign role.

The obligation to protect people, not misuse their powers

Police and police functions are a sovereign function, and any act carried out under sovereign function will not be then labelled as incorrect. The policeman would not be accountable but the action must be rational. These actions must also be within the limits specified for the discharge of sovereign function.

Police is a part of the society, and they have an obligation and commitment towards the commoners. They have a responsibility to protect the public and to serve the nation. They should not intimidate the commoners, and abuse their position and oppress others.

Under no circumstances, the police should be bias towards any specific individual. Important provisions, such as Article 14 (Right to Equality), says that every individual should be further treated equally regardless of gender, caste, colour, race, status, etc.

Conclusion

Is it lawful for the cops to beat those individuals who step out during a lockdown with or without any justification? This topic shows both aspects in itself i.e. Moral and juridical. From the very beginning, the Police System is the most significant component of the society. It helps to control and secure every entity in society.

According to my opinion, police power in the locality or society should be exercised but with greater control over the exercise of their sovereign power and the discharge of sovereign function. Like everything that have two sides, the police also have two facets. One that helps individuals by fulfilling their duty in people’s interests and the other that misuses their power to suppress the common people. It is important that the police be liable for their improper acts.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -