An Objective View of The Salman Khan Hit Aand Run Case – The Dark of The Moon

Must Read

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

The Competition Law Regime and Re-Tooling Patent Pools In India

The adversity to acquire licenses of various patented technologies can thwart the commercialization as well as the development of...

Solving Healthcare Issues Using Blockchain Technology

In troubled times that follow a pandemic, almost all nations are forced to take stock of the gaps present...

How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming the Legal Profession

In recent times, we have seen the introduction of artificial intelligence on a small yet phenomenally successful scale in...

Approaching the von Neumann Bottleneck: Neuromorphic Computing & beyond

“There are one trillion synapses in a cubic centimeter of the brain. If there is such a thing as...

Is India Truly Following the Footsteps of Mahatma Gandhi?

On October 2, 2020, it was the 151st birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi. India couldn’t celebrate it due to...

Follow us

The Salman Khan hit and run case has been going on and pending for a long time in the Indian courts. The incident that occurred about 12 years ago, wherein Salman Khan, the  famous Bollywood actor, was driving under the influence of alcohol, late at night and ran his vehicle over four destitute people, who were sleeping on the pavement on the silent roads of Aamchi Mumbai. Three of these were killed on the spot and one was left maimed. The Indian media went full with the claims that the whole trial is like an act in front of the Court wherein Salman Khan’s lawyers have put up vague arguments everyday ranging from absurd at worst to downright nonsensical at best.

One day, the lawyer comes up with an explanation of how the accident was caused as a result of the car falling from a crane on top of these people and crushing them, while a little later, it was claimed that Salman was not in fact behind the wheel while the accident occurred, but it was his driver who caused the accident. There were also reports of how his former bodyguard had stated on record that Salman was in fact the culprit in the case and had consequentially lost his job and left on the streets to die alone and uncared for.  After a long trial before the Sessions Court of Mumbai, it was finally adjudged that Salman Khan was indeed guilty and was to be sentenced for 5 years of imprisonment. However, within 3 days of the sentence Mr. Khan was granted bail by the Court.

Almost the entire Bollywood industry had shown unequivocal support for Salman Khan, and ever since the date of the verdict had been announced, he had been frequently visited by fellow actors and actresses at his Galaxy Towers’ residence. After the verdict was pronounced most of the celebrities immediately took to social media and public forums to express their annoyance at the verdict and heartfelt wishes for the actor. His ardent fans went on mass protests, fasts, and even self-immolation, in order to show their support to their favourite star.

A lot of the people believe that the actor should have been let go off, or sentenced lightly, because of the huge gap between the commission of the offence and the time of sentencing. It was argued that the man has suffered 12 years of constant mental agony and torture, because of the constantly looming threat of a trial and a sentence. It was also argued that since he has been a model citizen since then, and has had no run-ins with law apart from the black buck shooting incident, that his case should be considered on humanitarian grounds and his sentence be revoked.

Another argument that has constantly been brought up is that Salman Khan had already signed contracts for numerous films, and had in fact started shooting also for some of them, and his going to prison right now would mean monetary losses for the makers of these films. It was thus contended that even though these people had not committed any crimes, it would be they who would suffer, monetarily, and hence it is the duty of the law to make sure that innocent people are in no way harmed because of its processes.

However, not the entire India is flowing in one direction for the famous Salman Khan and there are a lot of people, who have expressed extreme displeasure and annoyance with both, the way the trial was conducted, as well as the outcome of the trial.

Now the bone of contention is that even though Salman Khan was found guilty at the end of the trial and was sentenced accordingly, he was granted immediate bail and hence did not have to spend any time in incarceration as punishment for his crimes. The main argument of these people was that had it been any other person he would have been languishing in jails for multiple years in pathetic conditions even before he was afforded the opportunity of a proper trial, and even if he did get one, he would have been sentenced again, and bail would have taken weeks at the least to come by.  However, since the case involved a well-known, well-connected celebrity, he who got to spend and elongated period of 12 years between commission of offence and trial, was out in the world as a free man with no restrictions whatsoever, enjoying his life in the lap of luxury, and even when he did finally get punished for his crime, he was immediately granted bail, making the whole trial an exercise in futility.

What a lot of the people see the Salman Khan trial as is a missed opportunity for the Indian Courts to send out a loud and clear message that no matter the social standing of a person, nobody is above the law and that justice will always be served. What happened instead was a façade of a trial, the outcome of which was that it made no change whatsoever to the life of the accused or the victims, but the courts now have a way of justifying themselves saying that they did their job and convicted him. Thus, the entire trial only served the purpose of clearing the Court’s name as shirkers of responsibility, and providing a legal protection of sorts to Mr. Khan

The Indian Judicial System has always been under great scrutiny from the general public and a greater part of India believes that the judiciary is inefficient at best, and is unable to effectively deal with the multitude of cases, especially the ones involving public figures or famous celebrities. There have been instances in the past where the judiciary has been unable to take any string action against well connected offenders and they have walked away scot free. The need of the hour is thus to set an effective example by successfully prosecuting and punishing a well-connected person to re-instil the faith of the public. That being said, however, does not justify the unjust prosecution and extra punishment to be provided to any celebrity only because an example needs to be set because that would be unjust to him.

Latest News

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

Chandigarh Housing Board Is Bound To Implement the Chandigarh Administration’s Policy Decision: Punjab & Haryana High Court

On 15th October 2020, Justices Jaswant Singh and Sant Parkash heard the case of Bhartendu Sood vs Chandigarh Housing Board & Anr., via video-conferencing. Deeming the...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of one year. The petitioners prayed...

Uttarakhand High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Relief for the Cancellation of Selection Process

On 13th October 2020, a Single Judge Bench of Hon'ble Justice Lok Pal Singh, heard the case of Ashish Bisht & Anr. v. State...

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against National Stock Exchange For Lack Of Merit

In the case of A. Kumar v. Financial Intelligence Unit & Ors., A. Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -