A Crises for Secularism: Critical Analysis on the Recent Killings of Bangladeshi Bloggers

Must Read

An Analysis of the Supreme Court of India’s Decision in Saurav Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh on Reservation

Reservation is one of the debatable realities of Indian constitution. This system got its roots from the exploitations due...

Explained: The Political Crisis in Nepal

On December 20th, K P Sharma Oli, the Prime Minister of Nepal dissolved the Lower House Parliament of the...

Can the Relatives of the Husband Attract Prosecution in Case of Triple Talaq?

The Supreme Court of India has recently made a judgement. It lays down that the relatives of the husband...

Explained: The Right to be Forgotten in India

Right to Privacy is an essential fundamental right which has been enshrined in the Indian Constitution under Article 21...

How will the New WhatsApp Privacy Policy Affect Us?

On January 4, 2020, the California based tech giant WhatsApp announced its new privacy law. It allows data integration...

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

Follow us

Bangladesh in the present year has seen a seething attack on its right to free speech and expression by the extremist group, allegedly Ansarullah Bangla Team, in which 4 bloggers namely –Avijit Roy, Washiqur Rahman, Ananta Bijoy Das, and Niloy Chakraborty have been killed.

These are not the first instances of such attacks on secular bloggers as the same began way back in 2013. It becomes important to trace the events from 2010 so as to have a holistic understanding of what really triggered these killings. In 2010, the incumbent Sheikh Hasina led secular government, Awami League, established a War Crime Tribunal to investigate the war crimes of the 1971 War of Independence from Pakistan. In February, 2013 Abdul Quader Molla, a member of Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami Party (an Islamist party), was sentenced to life imprisonment by the Tribunal.

This sentence evoked large scale criticism and attacks from secularist bloggers who advocated for the death sentence of Abdul and in continuance of their call for the capital punishment, the Shahibag Protest was organized and they further went on to seek the declaration of the Jamaat-e-Islami Party as an outlawed organization. However, this protest was faced with another counter protest by the Islamist groups, which quickly escalated into violence. The Islamist group denounced the war tribunal and went on to label the bloggers “atheist” and guilty of blasphemy. Moreover, the group called to stop the prosecution of the Jamaat-e-Islami party and instead called for the death sentence for the bloggers.

In 2014 a France based NGO, Reporters Without Borders, which seeks to protect and defend the freedom of press and information, brought to light the existence of an extremist group called “Defenders of Islam” which had published a hit list of 84 journalists, most of whom are secularist and out of which nine have already been killed and many others attacked. The present intolerance to secularism in Bangladesh triggered worldwide outrage and sensitization with the killing of Avijit Roy, a Bangladeshi born US citizen, who was a science writer and a blog site moderator.

The death of Avijit Roy was followed by the death of Washiqur Rehman, Ananta Bijoy Das and the most recent death was that of Niloy Chakrabarti (who used a pen name Niloy Neel). These deaths bear an uncanny similarity as, all the victims were secular bloggers and Ananta Bijoy Das and Niloy Chakrabarti used to write for Mukto Mona – which in fact was started by Avijit Roy.

All these attacks have been claimed to have been carried out by the Islamic extremist organization outfit, Ansarullah Bangla Team (ABT). According to Terrorist Research & Analysis Consortium, a digital intelligence storage containing research and analysis of terrorism and political violence, ABT is an Al-Qaeda inspired extremist organization. The group has also been claimed, by the local police, to be associated with Islamic Chhatra Shibir, Jamaat-e-Islam’s student wing.

The aim of all extremist Islamic groups is to propagate a religious state however, the growing political influence of secular bloggers along with blogs such as Mukto Mona, Dhormockery.com which propagate free thinking and often mock extremist Islamism has proved to be a major road block for such groups. It is even frightening to note that in this battle of religious extremism versus atheism, the much dreaded Al-Qaeda has also come to join the perpetrators of crime.

The involvement of Al-Qaeda is of paramount importance as after having lost ground to the newly established Islamic State, the Al-Qaeda supremo Ayman Al-Zawahari, who succeeded Osama Bin Laden, had announced last autumn of an expansion plan in South Asia and the religious strife in Bangladesh might just prove to be the fertile soil where they sow this seed of expansion. While there has been global condemnation of such intolerance, the reaction of the incumbent government of Bangladesh has been rather cold and anti-climactic. Secularism is a basic tenet of the Constitution of the Muslim majority Bangladesh nation. However, the nation seems to be in a turmoil of unsecular practices.

A secular state,  literally, implies to a country which is neutral to all religions within the nation i.e. to say the state neither associates nor disassociates itself from any religion. Maintaining secularism is primarily a function of the state and religious intolerance by individuals of a society prima facie does not amount to unsecular practices by the government but the fact that the Sheikh Hasina led Awami League government has given a cold shoulder to the religious intolerance is sufficient to term it as an unsecular act on the part of the government. Tahmina Rahman, director of the . There has been wide spread criticism of the government for their failure to take action against the perpetrators and there have been demonstrations and protest in different parts of the country for speedy trial and investigation against those arrested.

It is in respect to this reaction of the public that the mindset of the law keepers must be called into question. A police chief, AKM Shahidul Haque, had been quoted as saying that “No one should cross the limit”. This was said with respect to the secular bloggers and it is particularly unfortunate as limits to free speech, if legally extended to stop criticism of extremist religious views, they would fail the very purpose of granting free speech initially..

Even the legislations relating to free speech in Bangladesh are vague and ambiguous. The Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Act 2006 provides the legal framework for freedom of online expression. Ironically, the Law Minister, Anisul Huq, himself acknowledged that the law in itself is ambiguous for “certain offences such as obscenity and expression of false information”. Hence, the legislation is left open for arbitrary interpretation of the provisions and the government has in fact misused the same to arrest several bloggers and shut down websites for “defaming Islam”. There have been pleas for review of provisions (section 46 and 57) of the ICT Act and to give it a more definite form and removal of all provisions which can be interpreted arbitrarily and thus ensuring proper and constructive free speech to the nation.

It is here that the Bangladeshi government should look forth to its Indian counterpart’s judgment in the case of Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India, as decided on March 24, 2015, wherein the Apex Court ruled section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 to be unconstitutional on the grounds of being vague and arbitrary. On a concluding note, it is imperative in the spirit of secularism, as is preached globally, that the Bangladesh government becomes more sensitized to the issue of intolerance and not merely seeks to pacify mullahs with antiquated formalities just for the sake of cashing in on their major vote bank. It is of outmost importance for a developing country to sensitize people on tolerance and the largely condemnable attitude of the government needs to change.

Latest News

“Dismissal Without Inquiry Is Justified if Employee Did Not Prove Minimum Working Period”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the dispute relating to the termination of an employee without any disciplinary inquiry. Brief facts of the case The Respondent, Smt. Sureshwati was...

“Rape Victim To Be Provided Shelter Due To Media Attention Prohibited Under Section 228A of the IPC”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the petition by a rape victim for rehabilitation as she was social ostracization.  Brief facts of the case In this case, a writ...

Benefit of Probation Not Excluded by the Provisions of Mandatory Minimum Sentence Under Section 397 of Ipc

This case concerns the dispute regarding the granting of probation on good conduct to the accused under the age of twenty-one years.   Brief facts of...

Supreme Court Asks for the Centre’s Response on PIL Filed Seeking the Formation of a Media Tribunal

The Supreme Court sought responses from the Press Council of India (PCI), News Broadcasters Association (NBA) on a PIL which sought to set up a media tribunal to tackle issues concerning the media like complaints against media, channels, and networks. Media has become like an unruly horse that has to be tamed to express the plea.

Law Student Asked the Supreme Court To Take Suo Moto Cognizance of the Violent Farmer Protests

A law student of Mumbai University, Ashish Rai has asked the Supreme Court to take Suo Moto Cognizance of the insult to the national flag done by the farmer protests at the Red Fort. In the course of the farmer's tractor rally on Tuesday, some of the protesters unfurled their own flags by entering the premises of the Red Fort.

Farmers Meeting With the Supreme Court Committee Postponed To Jan 29 Due To the Traffic Restrictions

Due to the traffic restrictions after the violent protests broke out on Republic Day, the meeting of farmers with the Supreme Court Committee that was supposed to take place today was postponed to 29th January.

Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Judgment which said Groping without Skin Contact Not Sexual Assault under POCSO

The National Commission for Women (NCW) has challenged the Bombay High Court judgment where it stated that groping a child’s breasts without any ‘skin-to-skin’ contact will not be considered as sexual assault as defined under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Supreme Court Classifying Employees Based on Educational Qualifications for Promotion or Appointment Is Neither Violative of Article 14 nor of Article 16

This case concerns the dispute relating to the classification of employees belonging to the homogenous group based on educational qualifications. Brief facts of the case The...

Supreme Court Refuses To Transfer Petitions To Itself Related To ‘Love Jihad’ Filed in Allahabad High Court

On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the plea which was filed by the UP Government regarding the transfer of all the pleas challenging the ordinance the court passed, from Allahabad High Court to the Supreme Court.

Bombay HC Nagpur Bench Holds That Groping a Girl Without ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Is Not Sexual Assault

The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court acquitted a man charged under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and convicted him of a minor offence under IPC stating that there was no direct physical contact.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -