Central Government Notifies Amendment in Copyright Rules, 2021
The copyright regime in India is governed by the Copyright Act, 1957 and the Copyright rules, 2013. Copyright can be described as one of the
Home » Archives for April 30, 2021
The copyright regime in India is governed by the Copyright Act, 1957 and the Copyright rules, 2013. Copyright can be described as one of the
The Petitioner filed the revision petition for declaration and Injunction against the order of the District Judge, Sriganganagar. The District Judge had rejected the application filed by the petitioner under Order VII, Rule 11(d) CPC seeking rejection of the plaint is barred by law.
A single-judge bench consisting of Honorable Justice R. Raghunandan Rao passed an order in Criminal Petition no. 2620 of 2021. The Petitioner is booked for the offences under sections 188, 273, 420, 120(B) IPC and section 58, 59, 63 of FSSA (Food security and safety act), 2006 because the Petitioner was caught storing tobacco and tobacco products. The Petitioner who is facing such charges had approached the Court for relief.
The bench of Justice SG Chattopadhyay gave a verdict in Crl. Rev. P No.57/2018. The Court upheld the conviction of two accused under the essential commodities act.
About Shell Legal: Shell India’s activities occur within the complex Indian legal and regulatory system which has a multiplicity of authorities (viz. at federal, state
About the firm: Burgeon Law is a law firm for founders, startups, emerging growth companies, incubators, accelerators, angel investors, family offices and venture capital/private equity
About the firm: Burgeon Law is a law firm for founders, startups, emerging growth companies, incubators, accelerators, angel investors, family offices and venture capital/private equity
Sri Balram Chowdhury was found guilty under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1981. He was sentenced to pay Rs 1 Lakh to Manik Debnath. The other partner of the company Amiya Gopal Das was also convicted of the offence, but he paid the particular fine.
Petitioner has challenged impugned order dated passed by Judge, Family Court, Kailashahar. Declining to grant maintenance allowance to the petitioner and her daughter.
The Petitioner filed this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The Petitioner requested the Hon’ble Court to appoint an independent Arbitrator to solve the dispute between the parties.
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.