Allahabad High Court Sets Aside State Government Order To Extend Term of UP Sunni Waqf Board
Author: Sakina Kapadia Excerpt Two petitions had been filed before the High Court of Allahabad on July 1 2020, and September 30, 2020. The petitions
Home » Archives for January 30, 2021
Author: Sakina Kapadia Excerpt Two petitions had been filed before the High Court of Allahabad on July 1 2020, and September 30, 2020. The petitions
Excerpt The Court on Monday while hearing the matter over holding elections in the State during this pandemic and vaccination process held that “they cannot
Case Name: Manoj Tiwari vs. Manish Sisodia and Others [Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (crl.) No. 351 of 2021] The Supreme Court’s bench headed
Case Name: Jasmin Begum @Jesminara Begum vs. Union of India and Ors. [Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary Nos. 1564/2020] Supreme Court of India in the
Excerpt The three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court including Rohinton Fali Nariman, KM Joseph and Navin Sinha, held that the Section 3, 4 and 10
Excerpt Supreme Court passed an order on 22 January 2021 in which it was said that “lawyers should prevent accepting last-minute briefs” to circumvent the
Excerpt In these extreme situations of COVID-19, everyone is working virtually. The Courts, including various High courts and the Supreme Court, are no exception. After
Excerpt In Smt. Pasya Padma vs The State Of Telangana, on 25 January 2021, the Telangana High Court granted liberty to the petitioners to apply
The Supreme Court sought the Centre’s response on a PIL seeking uniform adoption and guardianship laws after recently entertaining a PIL that sought uniform legal provisions for divorce, maintenance, and alimony, thus bring up the issue of the Uniform Civil code.
The Supreme Court collegium took a step of withdrawing their recommendations to the Centre to make Pushpa Virendra Ganediwala, an additional judge in Bombay HC, a permanent judge. This step was taken considering the back-to-back controversial judgments relating to sexual offences such as ‘skin-to-skin’ contact is necessary for sexual assault and another judgement stating holding hands of a minor girl & opening pant zip not ‘Sexual Assault’ but ‘Sexual Harassment’ that Justice Ganediwala has taken.
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.