NGT Forms Panel Probe Into NHAI’s Non-Compliance of Conditions While Constructing Pune-Nashik Highway

Must Read

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years...

Follow us

The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Pune bench, has ordered a panel probe into National Highway Authority of India’s alleged violations of specific conditions imposed on it by the Environmental Clearance (EC) granted to it for up-gradation of 2 lane carriageway to 4 lanes of Khed-Sinnar Section of NH-50 Pune-Nashik Highway in the state of Maharashtra.

Brief Facts

The present application had been filed under Section 14 read with Section 15(3) and Section 20 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 raising issues of serious concern regarding blatant violation of the conditions of Environmental Clearance (EC) issued under the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006, by respondents no. 4- National Highway Authority of India (NHAI). Respondent no. 4 had been granted EC by the Respondent No. 1 in 2013 for up-gradation of 2 lane carriageway to 4 lanes of Khed-Sinnar Section of NH-50 Pune-Nashik Highway in the state of Maharashtra. The respondent no. 4 had violated the specific conditions related to limit of forest land allowed to be diverted for construction of impugned highway, avenue plantation of trees and rainwater harvesting along the impugned highway. The clearance letter imposed Specific conditions related to limit of forest land allowed to be diverted, avenue plantation and rainwater harvesting system.

Arguments Before the Court

The applicant claimed that Specific Conditions specifying the permissible amount of forest land diversions, construction of rainwater harvesting infrastructure, following of IRC guidelines for up-gradation of road and amount of trees to be planted as compensatory afforestation has not been complied with.

Court’s Analysis

The case dealt with Section 14 read with Section 15(3) and Section 20 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010. Section 14 discusses how the Tribunal can settle disputes. 

Section 20: Tribunal to apply certain principles. –The Tribunal shall while passing any order or decision or award, apply the principles of sustainable development, the precautionary principle and the polluter pay principle.

Court’s Observation and Decision

The NGT bench comprising of Justice Sheo Kumar Singh and Dr Satyawan Singh Garbyal ordered just and proper to constitute a Committee consisting of:

  1. Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Maharashtra
  2. A representative of NHAI, and
  3. Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (APCCF), MoEF&CC, Regional Office, Pune.

The Court also directed them to submit a factual and action taken report with regard to allegations made in the present application within 6 weeks. The Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Regional Office of the Environment Ministry in Pune shall serve as the nodal agency. The matter shall be next heard on 11th December 2020.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -