Supreme Court’s Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction Can Invalidate Trial Proceedings of an Offender under Section 462(1) of CrPC  

Must Read

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Follow us

Justice V. Ramasubramanian explained that when a Magistrate is not empowered to conduct a trial of an offence, such proceedings are void. Also, when a Court having no territorial jurisdiction conducts a trial for an offender, such proceedings are void under Section 462(1) of CrPC. 

Facts of the Case

The Petitioners have filed a transfer petition to transfer their criminal cases from Haryana to New Delhi. The said transfer is sought on two grounds, lack of territorial jurisdiction and a definite apprehension of bias. 

Petitioner’s Arguments 

The entire cause of action in respect of one case arose in Delhi, for the second case arose in Indore and for the third case arose in Surat.  

Respondents’ Arguments 

The Counsel for the Second respondent contends that the question of the cause of action is a question of fact to be established by evidence. It cannot be gone into in the transfer petitions. Also, in the loan granted to the Petitioner Company, the property offered as security is located in Gurugram. The Respondent was also actually sharing the office space of a company which is a 100% subsidiary of the Respondent.

Court’s Observations

The Bench explained that the jurisdiction in criminal court depends on two aspects, the offence and the offender. Chapter 35 of the CrPC answers the question about what happens when a court has no territorial jurisdiction, inquires, or tries an offence. Section 461(1) of the CrPC makes the trial proceedings void if the Court is not empowered to conduct the trial of the offender. This clause focuses on the offender and not on the offence.

The Bench noted that there are two types of jurisdictional issues for a Criminal Court. The power of the Court to try particular kinds of offences and the Court’s territorial jurisdiction. The Magistrate has the power to try a particular offence, but the controversy relates to his territorial jurisdiction. The case would be covered by the saving clause under Section 462 of the CrPC. Justice Ramasubramanian observed that the words “try an offence” are more appropriate than the words “tries an offender” in section 461 (l). This is because a lack of jurisdiction to try an offence cannot be cured by section 462. Hence, section 461 could have included the trial of an offence by a Magistrate, not empowered by law to do so, as one of the several items which make the proceedings void.

In contrast, the trial of an offender by a court which does not have territorial jurisdiction can be saved because of section 462. Provided there is no other bar for the court to try the said offender. But clause 1 of Section 461 makes the proceedings of a Magistrate void, when the trial is conducted but not empowered by law to do so.

Court’s Decision

The Court dismissed the transfer petitions due to a lack of evidence to prove the absence of jurisdiction.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -