Supreme Court Restores Punishment of Cashiering Imposed on Army Doctor

Must Read

Andhra Pradesh High Court: CRP Disposed; Parties Need to be Present Either Physically or Virtually

  The Single-Judge Bench of Andhra Pradesh High Court comprising of Hon'ble Smt. Justice Kongara Vijaya Lakshmi decided the case...

Bombay HC Pursues a Case Regarding Payment of Interest on Delayed Payment of Taxes: Says the Interest to Be Levied on the Net Cash...

  KLT Automotive and Tubular Products Limited filed a writ petition with the primary contention that interest is levied only...

Punjab & Haryana High Court: Registration of Fir Does Not Construe Any Final Opinion About the Case

Hitesh Bhardwaj (Petitioner) has preferred the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). The...

Allahabad High Court Directs University to Take Concerned Measures

The High Court of Judicature, Allahabad had decided the case Satya Prakash Tiwari & Others v. State Of U.P....

U.S. District Court Sentences NXIVM Founder Keith Raniere to 120 Years in Prison Over Sex Trafficking and Racketeering Charges

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York convicts NXIVM (pronounced “nexium”) founder, Keith Raniere, to...

Tripura High Court Provides Interim Relief to Prevent the Frustration of Object in a Writ Petition Alleging Error in NEET Scores

  In W.P(C) 720 of 2020, Hon’ble Justice S.G Chattopadhayay dealt with an interim relief prayed under a writ for...

Follow us

The Appellant was cashiered under the Army Act. The Court, in this case, discusses the relation between cashiering and forfeiture of pension payments of convicts.

Brief Facts of the Case 

The case involves two appeals. Lt. Col. S. S. Bedi is the appellant in the second appeal. Hence referred to as the Appellant. The appeals have been preferred against the judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal. Therein, the conviction of Lt. Col. S. S. Bedi was confirmed.

The Appellant was commissioned in the Indian Army Medical Corps. While stationed at Base Hospital Lucknow, a complaint was made by two women. The complainant raised the issue of misappropriate behaviour. The Appellant was alleged to have inappropriately touched the complainants. The General Court Martial charged and held the Appellant guilty of Section 354 of IPC. The Appellant was cashiered. The Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi converted cashiering to a fine.

Arguments

The Appellant argued that the evidence on record was unsustainable. It was not appreciated by the General Court Martial and the Tribunal. Also, the physical examination of the complainants was necessary for the ailments. Furthermore, the forfeiture of pensionary benefits is not automatic. Hence, the Appellant is entitled to payment of pension.

Per contra, the Respondent argued that the evidence was ample. Furthermore, the Respondents argued the conversion of the sentence from fine to cashiering.

Court’s View

The Court observed that the contention of the Appellant unacceptable. There was sufficient evidence on record. All pointed the fact that the Appellant misbehaved. Further, for bronchial asthma, squeezing of breasts and nipples was unnecessary. Additionally, there was no motive to falsely implicate the Appellant. Hence, a charge of guilt was well-founded.

The punishment for offences committed is dealt with under Section 71 of the Army Act. Section 71(d) stipulated cashiering. Section 71(h) stipulated forfeiture. The Court referenced the Union of India v. P. K. Dutta, 1995 Supp. (2) SCC 29. Therein, the Court dealt with Section 71(h) and Regulation 16(a) of Pension Regulation. Regulation 16(a) stipulates about how the pension is to be dealt with a dismissed officer. The Court held that there was no inconsistency between the two.

Furthermore, the Court referenced to Union of India v. P. D. Yadav, (2002) 1 SCC 405. The Court observed that Section 71 and Regulation 16(a) ‘operate in distinct fields.’ In the instant case, there was only cashiering of the Appellant. No proceedings were initiated under Regulation 16(a). The Court observed that the Respondents are at liberty to initiate proceedings under Regulation 16(a).

The Court found that conversion of cashiering to a fine not convincing. The actions of the Appellant as a doctor could not be condoned.

Court’s Decision

The Court restored the punishment of cashiering and directed it to refund the fine deposited.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Andhra Pradesh High Court: CRP Disposed; Parties Need to be Present Either Physically or Virtually

  The Single-Judge Bench of Andhra Pradesh High Court comprising of Hon'ble Smt. Justice Kongara Vijaya Lakshmi decided the case of Andhavarapu Swetha @ Tankala...

Bombay HC Pursues a Case Regarding Payment of Interest on Delayed Payment of Taxes: Says the Interest to Be Levied on the Net Cash...

  KLT Automotive and Tubular Products Limited filed a writ petition with the primary contention that interest is levied only on the net tax liability...

Punjab & Haryana High Court: Registration of Fir Does Not Construe Any Final Opinion About the Case

Hitesh Bhardwaj (Petitioner) has preferred the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). The petition seeks appropriate directions to...

Allahabad High Court Directs University to Take Concerned Measures

The High Court of Judicature, Allahabad had decided the case Satya Prakash Tiwari & Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Higher Edu. Lko...

U.S. District Court Sentences NXIVM Founder Keith Raniere to 120 Years in Prison Over Sex Trafficking and Racketeering Charges

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York convicts NXIVM (pronounced “nexium”) founder, Keith Raniere, to 120 years in prison over...

Tripura High Court Provides Interim Relief to Prevent the Frustration of Object in a Writ Petition Alleging Error in NEET Scores

  In W.P(C) 720 of 2020, Hon’ble Justice S.G Chattopadhayay dealt with an interim relief prayed under a writ for correction of marks obtained in...

NGT Pulls up PMC, Asks to Shift Waste Processing Plant at Baner

  Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 27th October 2020, directed Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) to close the plant and shift it to...

Plea Seeking Dream 11 to Be Declared as Betting Platform Dismissed by Rajasthan High Court

Rajasthan HC dismissed a plea that alleged Dream 11 to be a betting platform, on the assertion that the game depends on skill &...

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped her in a dressing room,...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -