Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition Claiming Promotion to the Post of Junior Bailiff

Must Read

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA)....

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Follow us

A group of persons working as Office Assistants/Record Clerks in various courts in the Erode District of Tamil Nadu filed a special leave petition in the Supreme Court. It came up after the High Court dismissed their claim for promotion to the post of Junior Bailiffs.

Brief Facts of the Case

A group of 22 persons working as Record Clerks and Office Assistants in Erode district at Tamil Nadu have filed a writ petition to consider their claim for promotion to the post of Junior Bailiff. The promotion was without insisting on the criteria of educational qualification of a pass in SSLC. The claim was based on a previous HC order, about vacancies under the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Services) Act, 2016. In this case, the SSLC pass was not insisted upon as a qualification for promotion to the post of Junior Bailiff. The other High Court rejected the claim on the ground that it holds no relevance in the present case.

Arguments Before the Court

All the 22 petitioners belong to various categories of Tamil Nadu Basic Services. Various recommendations by different committees laid down minimum educational qualification for recruitment purposes. They submitted that two posts of Junior and Senior Bailiff had different pay scales and benefits. The post of Junior Bailiff was an upgraded post and thus need not need a matriculation qualification for appointment. But, for the post of Bailiff, it prescribes the completion of SSLC as an essential qualification.

Court’s Ruling

The Apex Court is of the view that the petitioner cannot take refuge. It stated the fact that the SSLC qualification should not be taken until an amendment to the statutory rules is issued. They can also not lay a claim on the basis of the unamended Tamil Nadu Judicial Ministerial Service Rules. Also, they cannot claim anything even on the basis of Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Basic Services, since it does not contain any post called Junior Bailiff. Section 68 of the Tamil Nadu Act makes it clear that the Special Rules will prevail over the provisions of the Act if any provision of the act is inconsistent.

Thus, despite the omission of the High Court in taking note of Section 68 of the Act and the interpretation of Section 20, the Court finds the impugned order unassailable. There was no ground to interfere with the order of the High Court. The Court dismissed the special leave petition.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -