Supreme Court Directs Airlines To Refund All Collected Airfare To Passengers Who Cancelled Their Flights

Must Read

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract....

Chandigarh Housing Board Is Bound To Implement the Chandigarh Administration’s Policy Decision: Punjab & Haryana High Court

On 15th October 2020, Justices Jaswant Singh and Sant Parkash heard the case of Bhartendu Sood vs Chandigarh Housing Board...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of...

Uttarakhand High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Relief for the Cancellation of Selection Process

On 13th October 2020, a Single Judge Bench of Hon'ble Justice Lok Pal Singh, heard the case of Ashish...

Follow us

In the matter of Pravasi Legal Cell & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors, the Supreme Court heard multiple writ petitions seeking the same relief, therefore allowing all the cases to be heard jointly, which were then disposed of by this common verdict.

Brief Facts of the Case

In the COVID-19 pandemic situation, a lockdown was imposed by the Government of India from 25th March 2020. During the lockdown, running of all domestic and international flights was banned. Since it was further imposed on 3rd May 2020 along with the ban on the running of all the flights, the issue of refund of airfare was important in the lockdown when the domestic and international flights were suspended.

The PIL was filed to affirm on the action of airlines (respondent) as the airlines have not refunded the full amount collected for the booked tickets, due to the cancellation of all the flights. It is arbitrary and in violation of Civil Aviation Requirements (CAR), issued by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA).

Arguments Before the Court

The plea by a society sought a refund of the full payment of the amount collected for the tickets due to the cancellation of flights because of the restrictions imposed by the Government of India. It was submitted by the petitioners that it is compulsory for the airlines, to refund the full amount collected for the tickets. It was also stated that respondents are providing a credit shell with a validity of one year which is contrary to the CAR of May 2008.

A passenger association submitted to issue a consequential direction for the respondents to refund the same without levying any charges on account of cancellation. Pravasi Legal Cell contended that as per the order of the SC, airlines were challenged as the party respondents, and some of the airlines had filed applications on their own to step in, in the case which was allowed by this Court.

Observation of the Court

The Supreme Court observed that the various contentions and issues were highlighted from both sides and suggestions/formulations were also made. Therefore, the court decided to issue directions.

Decision of the Court

The Supreme Court has directed to refund all the collected fare to the passenger within 15 days of this judgment. If there is financial difficulty, then the airline shall provide credit shell equal to the amount collected to consume till 31st March 2021. With this direction, the writ petitions were disposed of.

Click here to view the original judgement


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

Chandigarh Housing Board Is Bound To Implement the Chandigarh Administration’s Policy Decision: Punjab & Haryana High Court

On 15th October 2020, Justices Jaswant Singh and Sant Parkash heard the case of Bhartendu Sood vs Chandigarh Housing Board & Anr., via video-conferencing. Deeming the...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of one year. The petitioners prayed...

Uttarakhand High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Relief for the Cancellation of Selection Process

On 13th October 2020, a Single Judge Bench of Hon'ble Justice Lok Pal Singh, heard the case of Ashish Bisht & Anr. v. State...

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against National Stock Exchange For Lack Of Merit

In the case of A. Kumar v. Financial Intelligence Unit & Ors., A. Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

The Federal Appeals Court Holds Trump’s Diversion of Military Funds To Build the Wall To Be Unlawful

The Federal Appeals Court held that US President Donald Trump’s diversion of military funds to build the wall is unlawful. A grey area in the...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Filed Challenging the Judgment of Madras High Court in Ganesan v. State Represented by Its Inspector of Police

An appeal was filed before the Supreme court, challenging the judgment & order of Madras High Court. The Supreme Court upheld the HC judgment...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of one year. The petitioners prayed...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -