Supreme Court Converts Conviction Under Section 302 to Section 304 Part II for Lack of Premeditated Intention

Must Read

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Follow us

Introduction

The Supreme Court has, on many occasions converted conviction under Sec. 302 to one under Sec. 304 Part II. However, every case depends on the facts and circumstances of each case. Therefore, the conversion of conviction depends on various grounds. In the instant case, the Court examined the ground of lack of premeditated intention. 

Brief Facts

The appeal was filed against an Order of conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The dispute between the deceased and the Appellant was over land. The Appellant assaulted the deceased who was harvesting in his field, with a lathi. The High Court concluded that it was not premeditated. The Court maintained the sentence under Sec. 302. 

Appellant’s Arguments

It has been submitted that the independent witnesses were not examined. The witnesses who were examined were all related to the deceased. Additionally, the blood found on the lathi did not match the blood group of the deceased. Lastly, the assault was not premeditated. 

State’s Arguments

Per contra, the Counsel for the State submitted that the Appellant was the aggressor. The Appellant intended to cause death. This was based on the assault made on the head. Additionally, references to decisions were made to state that evidence of related witnesses cannot be dismissed.  

Court’s View

The Court observed that ‘lathi’ is linked to the identity of a villager. Therefore, the circumstances and the method by which the deceased was assaulted, and other situations need to be considered by the Court while deciding ‘intention or knowledge’ of the Accused. 

The Court referenced to Chamru Budhwa v. Madhya PradeshAIR 1954 SC 652. Therein, the Court, with similar facts and circumstances, observed that ‘he acts appears to have been done with the knowledge that it was likely to cause death, but without any intention to cause death or to cause such bodily injury as is likely to cause death within the meaning of Part II of Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code.’ 

Similarly, in Gurmukh Singh v. the State of Haryana, (2009) 15 SCC 635, the Court observed that in cases where the assault was made without premeditation, the conviction needs to be altered from Sec. 302 to Sec. 304 Part II. The same situation was dealt with in Mohd. Shakeel v. the State of A.P., (2007) 3 SCC 119.

Judgment

The Appeal was allowed. Further, the conviction under Sec. 302 was altered to Sec. 304 Part II of IPC. Additionally, since the Appellant was under custody for a maximum period under Sec. 304 Part II of IPC, the Appellant was set at liberty.   


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by the Exporters Association before the...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -