SC Increases Compassionate Grant to Family of Late Employee by One Lakh

Must Read

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector &...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court,...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first...

Follow us

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh against the grant of Compassionate appointment to the Respondent. But, taking note of the economic hardship faced by the Respondent, the court increased the Compassionate grant amount.

Facts of the Case

The State of MP has filed this appeal against the grant of compassionate appointment to the respondent. This was on account of the demise of his father who was working as a driver in the Tribal Welfare Department in Madhya Pradesh. 

The respondent had first made this request to the appellant. It was rejected based on the policy in force for compassionate appointment as per the Madhya Pradesh government. The policy states that if the employee is a work charge or contingent fund employee at the time of his demise, there is no provision for the grant of such an appointment.

The respondent then appeared before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, which was accepted. The High Court asked the appellant to adhere to the request of the respondent. Another appeal was filed by the appellants before the division bench of the High Court. The High Court ordered the respondent to return the one lac advanced to them based on the Policy after he has received such appointment.

In pursuance of this order, The Appellant accepted the respondent’s claim. But subject to the following conditions:

  1. The amount of 1 Lac advanced should be returned.
  2. The appointment would be dependent on the availability of the vacancy or post.
  3. The posting offered would be compulsory, Lee accepted.
  4. If an SLP or an appeal is filed then the outcome of the same will be binding.

An SLP was filed by the Appellant in 2014. The respondent has not got the benefit of the compassionate appointment till now.

Arguments Advanced

The appellant relied on the principle that a compassionate appointment is not an inherent right but a prerogative of the state. It can only be granted as per the concerned policy. Clause 12.1 of the policy does not provide for compassionate appointments to such employees and the monetary benefit as allowed had already been granted.

The respondent raised the claim on the basis that his late father, who was appointed as a work charged employee was made permanent in 1987. He was paid a salary at a regular pay scale. He was also receiving the benefit of revision of pay and promotions were being extended to him.

Further, he was the only breadwinner of the family of six. And his death led his surviving family to suffer through great economic hardship. A pension payment order was issued in favour of the family under the Madhya Pradesh Civil Pension Rules, 1976. But given the economic hardship, the respondent filed an application seeking the benefit of a compassionate appointment.

Court’s Observations

The Court observed that it is trite to say that there cannot be an inherent right to compassionate appointment. It is instead right based on certain criteria, especially to provide succour to a needy family.

The bench distinguished between a work charged employee, a permanent employee, and a regular employee. According to the court, the respondent has missed the point of distinction between the three kinds of the employee. The late father of the respondent was a work charged employee. He attained this status as a permanent employee and was entitled to certain benefits, including pension and promotion. This does not ipso facto give him the status of a regular employee.

The court relied on the decision of Ram Naresh Rawat v Ashwani Ray to highlight the distinction between a permanent and a regularised employee. The court, thus, stated that it cannot be concluded that giving permanent status to some employees equates to regularising him.

Court’s Decision

The bench allowed this appeal. Further, using its inherent powers under Article 142 of the Constitution increased the compassionate grant amount from 1,00,000 rupees to 2,00,000 payable to the respondent.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being imposed.  Brief facts of the case This...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.  Brief facts of the...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court, Bhuj in the case of...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first consignment, on 10.06.2020 and the,...

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms (Dharanidhar Karimojji vs UOI). Brief Facts: The...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was to be enhanced or not.   Brief...

Delhi HC to Municipal Corp: Paucity of Funds Not an Excuse for Non-Payment of Salaries and Pensions

The Delhi High Court ruled that the paucity of funds cannot be an excuse and pulled up municipal corporations for not paying salaries and pensions to their employees as the right to receive payment is a fundamental right guaranteed in our constitution.

US Supreme Court Reinstates Restriction on Abortion Pills

The Supreme Court of the United States granted the Trump administration’s request to reinstate federal rules requiring women to make in-person visits to hospitals...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -