No Homeopathy Practitioner can claim to cure Covid-19: Supreme Court while changing Kerala HC Judgement

Must Read

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court,...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first...

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was...

Follow us

The Supreme Court bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhas Reddy, and MR Shah, relying upon the guidelines provided by the Ministry of AYUSH has held the observation of Kerala High Court as right in its observation as there is no ground for Homeopathy Doctors to claim that they can cure Covid-19 when the scientists of the whole world are engaged in research to find out a proper medicine for treating the Coronavirus.

Homoeopathy medicine can be used for mitigating and preventing Covid-19 and not curing it.

The court observed that as per the guidelines issued by the AYUSH Ministry, the use of Homeopathy can be done in three ways: –

  • Preventive & Prophylactic.
  • Symptom management of Covid-19.
  • Add on interventions to conventional care.

The Supreme Court observed,

The High Court in its impugned judgment has not fully comprehended the guidelines dated 06.03.2020 and taking a restricted view of the guidelines and have made observations for taking appropriate actions against the Homeopathic medical Practitioners, which cannot be approved.”

The SC held this after an appeal was filed against certain directions issued by the Kerala High Court. The appellant was not the party in the Writ Petition.

PIL Filed in Kerala High Court

The PIL was filed by an advocate who was praying for the writ of mandamus to be issued allowing the Homeopathy Practitioner to involve in curing Covid-19 patients in accordance with the Exhibit-P1 notification (Guidelines dated 06.03.2020 issued by Secretary, Department of AYUSH (Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, Sowa-Rigpa, and Homeopathy) (AYUSH, New Delhi).

The petitioner argued that the Homeopathic System would have been completely capable of regulating the spread of COVID-19 through its immunity-boosting medicines. The petitioner further claimed in the writ petition that if Homeopathic drugs had been distributed earlier in highly affected pockets and in particular, to those in isolation and quarantine, the explosive situation had not arisen in the State of Kerala.

Kerala High Court disposed of the Writ Petition

The division bench of the High Court considering the advisory orders of the Government of India, Ministry of AYUSH, Government Order by the Government of Kerala, disposed of the petition.

The court had held,

As per the State Medical Protocol, COVID-19 affected persons should not be treated by anybody other than the Government and those authorized by the Government. As per the medical protocol of the Government, doctors practicing in AYUSH medicines are not supposed to prescribe any medicines, stating that it is curative for COVID-19 disease. When the Central, as well as State Governments, have approved prescription of certain mixtures and tablets, as immunity boosters, qualified medical practitioners in AYUSH can also prescribe the same, but only as immunity boosters.”

The court also said that respondents can take actions against any qualified doctor practising AYUSH medicine under Disaster Management Act, 2005 if they advertise any cure/ medicine for covid-19 except for those who are specifically mentioned in the order.

The Appeal in the Supreme Court

The appeal was filed by Dr. AKB Sadbhavana Mission School of Homeo Pharmacy, saying the order of the High Court to take action under the Disaster Management Act, 2005, very harsh and prejudiced against the Homeopathy Practitioners.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgement from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also contribute blog, articles, story tip, judgment and many more and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being imposed.  Brief facts of the case This...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.  Brief facts of the...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court, Bhuj in the case of...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first consignment, on 10.06.2020 and the,...

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms (Dharanidhar Karimojji vs UOI). Brief Facts: The...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was to be enhanced or not.   Brief...

Delhi HC to Municipal Corp: Paucity of Funds Not an Excuse for Non-Payment of Salaries and Pensions

The Delhi High Court ruled that the paucity of funds cannot be an excuse and pulled up municipal corporations for not paying salaries and pensions to their employees as the right to receive payment is a fundamental right guaranteed in our constitution.

US Supreme Court Reinstates Restriction on Abortion Pills

The Supreme Court of the United States granted the Trump administration’s request to reinstate federal rules requiring women to make in-person visits to hospitals...

Supreme Court Upheld “Environmental Rule of Law” in NGT Decision to Demolish Illegal Hotel on Forest Land

This case concerns the dispute relating to the additional construction of hotel-cum-restaurant structure in the Bus Stand Complex along with a bus stand and...

UK Supreme Court Rules in Favour of Policyholders in the COVID-19 Business Interruption Case

The United Kingdom’s Supreme Court finally concluded the long-awaited COVID-19 business interruption case brought by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Hiscox Action...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -