Multani Murder Case: Top Court wants the Charge sheet to be filed against ex-DGP Saini on record

Must Read

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India &...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to...

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Follow us

The Punjab Govt was asked by the Supreme court to place on record the charge sheet filed under the FIR lodged against the former Director in General of Police (DGP) Sumedh Singh Saini on Tuesday. The charges were of 1991 disappearance and murder of a young engineer Balwant Singh Multani.

The Supreme court had already granted bail to the DGP on a fresh case filed in the 1991 disappearance and murder of Multani. The bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Subhash Reddy, and MR Shah is hearing Saini’s plea to dismiss the fresh FIR lodged in the case in May 2020.

Gopal Subramaniam, senior counsel for the state asked for additional time to submit the charged sheet and other documents on record. The Counsel of petitioner submitted that matter be listed in February 2021. The court listed it in the second week of February 2021.

The bench said that it has been informed by the counsel of the state that, the magistrate has fixed the date of January 22nd, 2021 for the appearance of Saini. The court asked for the postponement of the date till the end of February 2021.

However, senior advocate Gopal Subramaniam said that the charge sheet has been filed on the matter and court summons have been sent to Saini to appear on January 22nd, 2021 before the court. He believed that since this matter had to be heard at length, Saini can appear before the court and take charge of the charge sheet.

The Senior advocate Mukul Rohtagi, on behalf of the petitioner, sought a stay on the proceedings on the charge sheet filed in the trial court and suggested that it should be taken to the Supreme court. The reason he stated was that there could be no proceedings over the charge sheet when the validity of the FIR lodged is yet to be determined.

Advocate Rohatgi added that Saini cannot be asked to appear before the trial court and hence pleaded if his lawyer’s appearance can be recorded on behalf of Saini.

In response to this, the Punjab Government said that it will do no prejudice to anyone as the matter is pending before the top court. The govt added that Saini will be required to appear before the trial court as summons have been issued against him.

The court granted anticipatory bail to Saini on a fresh case lodged in the 1991 disappearance and murder of Multani in December last year.

While working in the Chandigarh industrial and tourism corporation as a junior engineer, Saini was booked in connection to the disappearance and murder of Mr. Multani. Saini along with 6 others was booked by Multani’s brother, a resident in Jalandhar.

The case registered against them was punishable under sections 201(Causing disappearance of evidence), 364 (Kidnapping or abducting to murder), 330 (voluntarily causing hurt), 344 (wrongful confinement), and 120(B) (Criminal conspiracy) at Mataur police station.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgement from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also contribute blog, articles, story tip, judgment and many more and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Uttarakhand High Court Directed State Authorities To Frame SOP Regarding Kumbh Mela 2021

Noticing the commencement date of Kumbh Mela 2021 amid pandemic from 27 February 2021, the Uttarakhand High Court on Monday expressed concern with regard to organizing and conducting of the Mela and directed State Authorities to discuss and resolve the logistical problems which can come in organizing the Mela during the pandemic time.

Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Mahindra Finance, Being a Purely Private Body: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reiterated that Writ Petition against the purely private body is not maintainable and dismissed the petition which was filed against Mahindra Finance Bank as Arif Khan v. Branch Manager Mahindra Finance Sultanpur & Another.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -