Gravity of Crime Cannot Be the Sole Basis for Refusing Premature Release: Supreme Court

Must Read

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

[HUL – Sebamed Ad War] Bombay High Court Passed Injunction; Permits Sebamed Ad Against HUL’s Dove

The ad war between the German personal care brand Sebamed and the consumer goods giant Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) has come to an end. On January 19th, Bombay High Court passed an injunction order permitting the Sebamed ad against Hindustan Unilever’s Dove without any changes. It was observed that Sebamed ads were backed with evidence-based data. However, Sebamed was ordered to put an end to its advertisement that compared HUL soap bars Lux, Pears, and Santoor with Rin and detergent category.

Bombay High Court Says White Collar Crimes Are More Dangerous Than Murder and Dacoity

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court rejected 4 petitions of 4 businessmen after observing that white-collar crimes are more serious than murder and dacoity. The businesspersons were booked for fraud of evading GST by producing fake invoices.

Right To Protection Can’t Be Granted To Married Woman Involved in Live-in Relationship: Allahabad High Court

The Bench of Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition of a live-in couple, observing that a married woman in a live-in relationship is not entitled to any sort of legal protection whatsoever. The Court remarked that they are adults and should live as ‘husband and wife’ if they want no one to interfere in their lives.

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

Follow us

A Full Bench of the Supreme Court held that the premature release of the accused must be based on the goal of reformation. The Bench opined that the conduct of the accused must be scrutinized for deciding the possibility of the repetition of the offence.

Brief Facts of the Case

The Appellants kidnapped the victim, their friend, for ransom. Further, the victim was kidnapped at gunpoint. The victim’s father filed a missing report. While exchanging the ransom money to the hands of the Appellants, the victim’s father tipped off the police. The police then raided the home of the Appellants. 

The Trial Court charged the Appellants under Section 364A of IPC. Another charge under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 was also imposed. Life imprisonment and fine were awarded to each accused of the offence of Kidnapping for ransom. 

The Appellants were denied a grant for premature release by the Respondent State. This was despite a long imprisonment period along with established good conduct.

Hence, this special leave petition was filed before the Court.

Arguments Advanced

The Counsel for the State submitted that the Petitioners’ crime is heinous. Also, the victim’s family is apprehensive of a repetition of the crime. The governmental authorities reasoned that their release may cause harm to society. 

The Appellants’ Counsel argued that the lengthy imprisonment and good conduct of the Appellants in jail were overlooked. The Counsel re-iterated their qualification for premature release on the same.

Court’s Observations

The Bench supported the reformative theory, condemning a punitive attitude for a civilized society. It observed that first-time offenders should be deal with liberally. They should be given a chance to repent their past and to look forward to a bright future.

There exists a restriction under Section 433A of CrPC against the release of persons sentenced to life imprisonment. They cannot be released until they have served at least fourteen years of their actual sentence.

The Bench observed that the Government orders dismissing a premature release of the Petitioner overlooks Section 2 of the UP Prisoners Release on Probation Act, 1938. The Act provides a three-factor evaluation of antecedents, conduct during imprisonment, and also the likelihood to abstain from crime.

It was noted that the State’s refusals were not based on facts or evidence. The Bench termed the reasons to be vague and unsubstantiated opinions of the State authorities.

The Bench reiterated that the length of the sentence or gravity of the original crime cannot be the sole basis for refusing premature release.

As per the State’s affidavit, the conduct of the Appellants has been more than satisfactory. They have no material criminal antecedents and have served almost sixteen years in custody. Although fifty-four and forty-three years in age, the Bench noted that they still have a good amount of years of life remaining.

However, the Court held that this alone does not prove that they tend to commit offences. The State’s repeated reliance on age defeats the purpose of remission and probation, despite the Appellants having met all statutory requirements for premature release.

Court’s Decision

The Court ordered the release of the Appellants on probation according to Section 2 of the UP Prisoners Release on Probation Act, 1938. The Court noted that they could still be imposed with reasonable restrictions by the State to balance public safety with individual liberty.

Further, the Bench stated that the present order is reversible and can be recalled in the event of any future misconduct by the Petitioners.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

[HUL – Sebamed Ad War] Bombay High Court Passed Injunction; Permits Sebamed Ad Against HUL’s Dove

The ad war between the German personal care brand Sebamed and the consumer goods giant Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) has come to an end. On January 19th, Bombay High Court passed an injunction order permitting the Sebamed ad against Hindustan Unilever’s Dove without any changes. It was observed that Sebamed ads were backed with evidence-based data. However, Sebamed was ordered to put an end to its advertisement that compared HUL soap bars Lux, Pears, and Santoor with Rin and detergent category.

Bombay High Court Says White Collar Crimes Are More Dangerous Than Murder and Dacoity

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court rejected 4 petitions of 4 businessmen after observing that white-collar crimes are more serious than murder and dacoity. The businesspersons were booked for fraud of evading GST by producing fake invoices.

Right To Protection Can’t Be Granted To Married Woman Involved in Live-in Relationship: Allahabad High Court

The Bench of Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition of a live-in couple, observing that a married woman in a live-in relationship is not entitled to any sort of legal protection whatsoever. The Court remarked that they are adults and should live as ‘husband and wife’ if they want no one to interfere in their lives.

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

Women Advocates Move To Supreme Court Against the Delhi HC Orders on Resuming Physical Hearing

Another writ petition has been filed by women advocates in the Supreme Court against the decision of the Delhi HC of directing the expansion of physical hearing of cases within the National Capital Territory of Delhi without giving an option to litigants to be represented by their lawyers virtually.

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus. The petition sought to direct...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -