Singaporean Citizen Pleads Guilty to Working as a Chinese Spy in the U.S.

Must Read

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found...

Follow us

On July 24, Jun Wei Yeo pled guilty to acting as an illegal agent within the United States. Chinese Intelligence had deployed him in the country. Jun Wei Yeo is also known as Dickson Yeo. He is a Singaporean national.

Facts of the Case

In 2018, the Chinese Intelligence Officials directed Yeo to create a fake consulting company. This was to target the US government employees and an Army officer. The fake company appropriated the name of a renowned U.S. consulting firm. The latter also dealt with public and government relations. Strategically, Yeo then advertised for job openings in the company created by him. He received many resumes. The U.S. military and government personnel were among the majority to apply. Yeo then forwarded the resumes to a Chinese intelligence operative. This was done with an ulterior motive to send sensitive U.S. government information.

Yeo also used a professional networking website. Using the site, he targeted potential individuals having access to confidential information. Chinese Intelligence officials directed him to employ vulnerable persons. These included people who were under a financial crunch. Others too were recruited to gather sensitive data about the U.S. government. The same was then transferred to the Chinese government. 

The Investigation

The FBI’s Washington Field Office and the Department of State’s Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) conducted the investigation. Yeo entered his plea via videoconferencing. Yeo’s act as an illegal agent of the Chinese Government violates 18 U.S.C. 951. The maximum penalty for such an infringement is 10 years in prison. He pled guilty before the Honourable Tanya S. Chutkan in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

The Significance

John C. Demers has condemned Yeo’s act, calling him out. Such an incident is an example of how the Chinese Government exploits “the openness of the American society”, he remarked. 

The truth is that Yeo’s stratagem marks one of the many facets of the Chinese government’s clandestine motives. China, daily recruits people. These people then collate sensitive, non-public information. The same data is then used by China to its advantage. The FBI has implored the citizens to be wary of such professional networking social media sites. Especially the ones that hold security clearances. The FBI has resolved to hold people working for the Chinese Intelligence accountable. The U.S. National Security must not be compromised at any cost as stated by the FBI.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped her in a dressing room,...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on behalf of all the minority...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the National Commission for Women. The...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -