Kerala HC Issues Directions to Alappuzha MC Hospital to Review Non-COVID 19 Patient’s Case

Must Read

Internship Opportunity at Jain & Partners, Delhi: Registration Open

About the Firm Jain & Partners is an IPR & Corporate law consultancy firm, which provides possible solutions to almost...

Appeal Must Be Filed Within 45 Days of Public Announcement: NCLAT

In the case of Girish Baduni vs Punjab National Bank, an appeal was filed against the order dated 20th September...

Call for Papers: Lawjustify Volume 01 Issue 02

About the Lawjustify Lawjustify is a novel platform that aims to cater to the needs of law students by providing them...

Brief facts

Mr Radhakrishnan R, aged 58, filed a writ petition in the Kerala High Court. The Alappuzha Medical College hospital had closed its Cardiac OP wing following the COVID-19 pandemic. The petitioner is a cardiac patient and has claimed to be ‘medically stranded’ due to this.

Petitioner’s Arguments

The petitioner submitted that his medical diagnosis showed three blockages in his heart. Additionally, he had also suffered cardiac arrests before. The closure of the Alappuzha Medical College Hospital’s Cardiac OP for non-COVID-19 patients has left several patients aggrieved. On these grounds, the hospital denied his request for cardiac bypass surgery. The petitioner further stated that he falls under the BPL category. Thus, he cannot afford a hefty sum of over ₹10 Lakh to pay for the surgery in a private hospital. Thus, the counsel for the petitioner prayed to the Court for directions to open the cardiac OP wing.

Respondent’s Arguments 

The learned Government Pleader took notice of the respondents. He submitted that the Dept. of Cardiology in the Government Medical College hospital will review the petitioner’s case. He further stated that if the petitioner is found to be suitable to undergo the surgical procedure, the hospital will take appropriate follow-up actions. 

Held

The Court issued an interim order to the hospital to review the petitioner’s case at the earliest. The Court added that the petitioner may go through with the due procedure, in case he is suitable for the same. Hon’ble Justice Anu Sivaram gave directions and posted the hearing after three weeks. 


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

- Advertisement -

Latest News

Internship Opportunity at Jain & Partners, Delhi: Registration Open

About the Firm Jain & Partners is an IPR & Corporate law consultancy firm, which provides possible solutions to almost...

Appeal Must Be Filed Within 45 Days of Public Announcement: NCLAT

In the case of Girish Baduni vs Punjab National Bank, an appeal was filed against the order dated 20th September 2019 which was duly passed...

Call for Papers: Lawjustify Volume 01 Issue 02

About the Lawjustify Lawjustify is a novel platform that aims to cater to the needs of law students by providing them a comprehensive learning and engaging...

ConQuest 5.0: Quiz on the Indian Constitution, Law, History and Politics by CLPR [Oct 3-18]: Registrations Open

About the Organiser The Centre for Law and Policy Research, Bangalore (CLPR) is a not-for-profit dedicated to making the Constitution work for everyone through law...

National E-Conference on Public Health Law in India by Parul University [Sep 27]: Register Now!

About the University Parul Institute of Law, Faculty of Law offers various programs in law, which was established in 1993. Currently, it caters to students from...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -