Delhi High Court Directs the Transport Department to Deposit Help Packages of ₹5,000 Within 10 Days

Must Read

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and...

Follow us

On May 29, 2020, the High Court entertained a PIL concerned with the delay in help package announced for Auto Rickshaw drivers. Justice Hima Kohli and Justice Subramonium Prasad heard the matter. 

Facts of the Case

The prayer sought the issuance of directions to the Department of Transport. The Chief Minister of Delhi announced a one-time relief help package of Rs. 5,000/- to auto-rickshaw, e-rickshaw and Gramin Sewa vehicle drivers on 2nd April. The CM announced this as a compensation for the loss that they would suffer because of the lockdown. After a reasonable time, on April 25, the petitioner had made a representation to the respondent. He stated that the financial assistance as promised had not been received by PSV badge holders. Additionally, he stated that they are facing great hardship being unable to ply their vehicles. When he received no effective reply, he filed the present petition. 

Contentions of the Petitioner

The learned counsel submitted that repeated representations were made to the Respondent. But, they have not elicited any effective response. The counsel also contested that the Transport Department is discriminating between PSV badge holders with chip and without chip. The Respondent stated that the Transport Department is giving financial assistance of Rs. 5,000/- to every PSV badge holder in Delhi who has a valid Driving License on or after 01.02.2020. They are providing the assistance package irrespective of whether the said badge has a chip or not.

The Department stated that they have made software for applicants with chip-based badges and non-chip-based badges. The Respondent also submitted that the 2010 data was non-chip based. This data was unavailable in the software of the Department. The IT Wing of the Transport Department had to match the data through a separate process. The Respondent stated that all the eligible applicants have been identified. The Transport Department has identified 11780 applicants holding non-chip PSV badges. Out of the said 11780 eligible applicants, the Department has transferred a sum of Rs. 5,000/- to 4835 persons.

Observation of the Court

The Court inquired the counsel for the Respondent on time required to clear the list of the remaining persons. The learned counsel stated that the Court may grant the Department a period of 15 days to deposit the amount of Rs. 5,000 to the remaining applicants. The Court observed that the CM announced the scheme in early April 2020 and now, it is already too late. The bench opined that the department has already taken enough time to release the assistance package. The Court stated that there was enough time for the Department to release the funds to the eligible applicants.

Court’s Decision

The Court dismissed the petition by granting 10 days’ time to the Transport Department. The Court directed them to clear the balance list by depositing a sum of Rs. 5,000/- to the eligible non-chip PSV badge holders within this time.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

Latest News

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala gave...

UAPA Cannot Be Used When the Accused Does Not Have an Active Knowledge of the Offence: Delhi High Court

Justice Suresh Kumar Kait held that the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act cannot be charged on the accused when he does not have any knowledge...

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -