Delhi High Court Directs the Transport Department to Deposit Help Packages of ₹5,000 Within 10 Days

Must Read

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus....

Gujarat High Court Directs To Register Name of Petitioners in the Society Records as Owners of Property, as per Will

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that...

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Follow us

On May 29, 2020, the High Court entertained a PIL concerned with the delay in help package announced for Auto Rickshaw drivers. Justice Hima Kohli and Justice Subramonium Prasad heard the matter. 

Facts of the Case

The prayer sought the issuance of directions to the Department of Transport. The Chief Minister of Delhi announced a one-time relief help package of Rs. 5,000/- to auto-rickshaw, e-rickshaw and Gramin Sewa vehicle drivers on 2nd April. The CM announced this as a compensation for the loss that they would suffer because of the lockdown. After a reasonable time, on April 25, the petitioner had made a representation to the respondent. He stated that the financial assistance as promised had not been received by PSV badge holders. Additionally, he stated that they are facing great hardship being unable to ply their vehicles. When he received no effective reply, he filed the present petition. 

Contentions of the Petitioner

The learned counsel submitted that repeated representations were made to the Respondent. But, they have not elicited any effective response. The counsel also contested that the Transport Department is discriminating between PSV badge holders with chip and without chip. The Respondent stated that the Transport Department is giving financial assistance of Rs. 5,000/- to every PSV badge holder in Delhi who has a valid Driving License on or after 01.02.2020. They are providing the assistance package irrespective of whether the said badge has a chip or not.

The Department stated that they have made software for applicants with chip-based badges and non-chip-based badges. The Respondent also submitted that the 2010 data was non-chip based. This data was unavailable in the software of the Department. The IT Wing of the Transport Department had to match the data through a separate process. The Respondent stated that all the eligible applicants have been identified. The Transport Department has identified 11780 applicants holding non-chip PSV badges. Out of the said 11780 eligible applicants, the Department has transferred a sum of Rs. 5,000/- to 4835 persons.

Observation of the Court

The Court inquired the counsel for the Respondent on time required to clear the list of the remaining persons. The learned counsel stated that the Court may grant the Department a period of 15 days to deposit the amount of Rs. 5,000 to the remaining applicants. The Court observed that the CM announced the scheme in early April 2020 and now, it is already too late. The bench opined that the department has already taken enough time to release the assistance package. The Court stated that there was enough time for the Department to release the funds to the eligible applicants.

Court’s Decision

The Court dismissed the petition by granting 10 days’ time to the Transport Department. The Court directed them to clear the balance list by depositing a sum of Rs. 5,000/- to the eligible non-chip PSV badge holders within this time.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

Latest News

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus. The petition sought to direct...

Gujarat High Court Directs To Register Name of Petitioners in the Society Records as Owners of Property, as per Will

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that the petitioners were entitled to...

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there is no requirement of passing...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -