Delhi High Court Directs the State to Provide Ration to E-Coupon Holders

Must Read

Madras HC Reaffirms Trial Court’s Decree in Case of Thimmaraya & Ors. V. Gowrammal

A Civil Revision Petition was filed by three petitioners against the dismissal of their application on the file of...

Delhi High Court Disposes Ashok Arora’s Appeal Against Suspension From Supreme Court Bar Association

In the present Petition, Senior Advocate Ashok Arora challenged an Order passed by a Single Judge bench. The Order...

Allahabad High Court Dismisses Application To Quash Prima Facie Allegations of Criminal Intimidation and Outraging Modesty

Allahabad High Court, on 17th November 2020, dismissed an application filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and refused to...

Delhi High Court Prohibits Gathering in Public Places To Celebrate Chhat Puja

The Order had come in a Writ Petition moved by Shri Durga Jan Seva Trust. The Petition sought to...

Bombay High Court Directs State To Pass Tribe Claim Within Two Weeks, Refuses To Intervene on Merits of Claim Itself

The Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S.S. Shinde and Madhav Jayajirao Jamdar passed an order...

Kerala High Court Dismisses Petition by Allocating Respondent To Vacancy in IFS Cadre

On 16th November 2020, the Division Bench at Kerala High Court, consisting of Honourable Justice A.M. Shaffique and Honourable...

Follow us

Ms Shabnam, a law student residing in Sultan Puri, Delhi filed the present petition. She raised a grievance that despite the Delhi government issuing e-coupons to 1982 persons in the area, they have not been delivered ration from the Ration Distribution Centre (RDC) for the past one month. The bench of Justice Hima Kohli and Justice Subramonium Prasad disposed of the petition along with the pending applications.

Facts of the Case

After the Central Government implemented the nationwide lockdown, the Delhi Government announced a scheme. The scheme provided ration to the non-ration cardholders through e-coupons. The petitioner has stated that the “poorest of poor and the neediest among the neediest” are unable to get the ration.

Arguments by the Petitioner 

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has made representations to Respondent No.1. She had requested that ration shops deliver ration through e-coupons at the earliest. This was because e-coupon holders returned home empty-handed due to paucity of ration. The petitioner also contended that all the people cannot avail e-coupons. This was because the people who need E-Coupons do not have access to smartphones and the internet.

She also stated that the form is not as simple as the State mentioned. The petitioner has impleaded FCI as Respondent No.2 and the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, UOI as Respondent No.5. However, no relief is directed against Respondents No.2 and 3.

Arguments by the Respondent

The learned counsel for the respondent No.2 stated that FCI is neither a necessary nor a proper party in the proceedings. The learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4 concede that there has been a paucity of ration at some PDS centres. It includes the one at Nigam School, Sultan Puri, Delhi. She assured the Court that the RDC set-up will supply ration to all the e-coupon holders in the area.

She submitted that efforts have been made to supply enough ration to the said RDC but there are still e-coupon holders who have not received the ration. The counsel has requested one week’s time to supply ration to all the e-coupon holders.

Court’s Decision

The Court observed that it is unacceptable that ration shops leave e-coupon holders high and dry, despite the Delhi government having issued e-coupons in such large numbers. It criticized GNCTD stating that it must have ensured sufficient quantities of ration are available in proportion to the number of e-coupons issued for purposes of distribution. The Court directed Respondents No. 1, 3 and 4 to ensure that the RDC supplies ration to all pending e-coupon holders. The Court stated that the petitioner is entitled to approach this Court if the authorities fail to do so. The Court also pointed out that it shall be viewing non-compliance seriously.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

Latest News

Madras HC Reaffirms Trial Court’s Decree in Case of Thimmaraya & Ors. V. Gowrammal

A Civil Revision Petition was filed by three petitioners against the dismissal of their application on the file of the Sub-Judge, Hosur. The case...

Delhi High Court Disposes Ashok Arora’s Appeal Against Suspension From Supreme Court Bar Association

In the present Petition, Senior Advocate Ashok Arora challenged an Order passed by a Single Judge bench. The Order held that Mr Arora had...

Allahabad High Court Dismisses Application To Quash Prima Facie Allegations of Criminal Intimidation and Outraging Modesty

Allahabad High Court, on 17th November 2020, dismissed an application filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and refused to quash the charge sheet (dated...

Delhi High Court Prohibits Gathering in Public Places To Celebrate Chhat Puja

The Order had come in a Writ Petition moved by Shri Durga Jan Seva Trust. The Petition sought to quash and set aside an...

Bombay High Court Directs State To Pass Tribe Claim Within Two Weeks, Refuses To Intervene on Merits of Claim Itself

The Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S.S. Shinde and Madhav Jayajirao Jamdar passed an order on 17th November 2020 in...

Kerala High Court Dismisses Petition by Allocating Respondent To Vacancy in IFS Cadre

On 16th November 2020, the Division Bench at Kerala High Court, consisting of Honourable Justice A.M. Shaffique and Honourable Justice Gopinath. P heard the...

AP High Court: If an Auction Is Conducted by a Cooperative Bank, the Property Ceases to be Property of the State

A single-judge bench consisting of honourable justice Ninala Jayasurya gave orders on the writ petition filed by the petitioner. The petition challenges the action...

Madras HC Rules in Favour of the Authorities in FMGE Examination, Finds Writ Petitions Against the Exam Void of Merit

Three aspirants of Foreign Medical Examinations moved to the High Court by filing a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. They...

Hong Kong High Court Rules for Independent Mechanisms To Be Set up To Deal With Complaints Against Police Officers

The present suit was brought by a journalist association because of the police brutality that the protestors faced in the protests against the China...

Madras High Court Maintains That Government Policy Is To Prioritize Own State’s Candidates and Sets Aside Nativity Certificate Rejection Order

Varsha Totagi, a NEET aspirant filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. She had been denied Nativity Certificate without which...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -