Bombay High Court Directs Customs to Handover Feeding Tubes to Cancer Fighters

Must Read

Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Judgment which said Groping without Skin Contact Not Sexual Assault under POCSO

The National Commission for Women (NCW) has challenged the Bombay High Court judgment where it stated that groping a child’s breasts without any ‘skin-to-skin’ contact will not be considered as sexual assault as defined under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Supreme Court Classifying Employees Based on Educational Qualifications for Promotion or Appointment Is Neither Violative of Article 14 nor of Article 16

This case concerns the dispute relating to the classification of employees belonging to the homogenous group based on educational...

Supreme Court Refuses To Transfer Petitions To Itself Related To ‘Love Jihad’ Filed in Allahabad High Court

On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the plea which was filed by the UP Government regarding the transfer of all the pleas challenging the ordinance the court passed, from Allahabad High Court to the Supreme Court.

Bombay HC Nagpur Bench Holds That Groping a Girl Without ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Is Not Sexual Assault

The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court acquitted a man charged under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and convicted him of a minor offence under IPC stating that there was no direct physical contact.

Delhi High Court Restrains Publication of Book on “the Ryan School Murder”

The Order had come in an injunction application filed by the St. Xavier's Education Trust in Delhi. The Plaintiff...

Supreme Court Closed Proceeding in Case of “in Re: Advocate on Record Includes a Proprietary Firm Etc.”

Brief facts of the case Emails from the Petitioner resulted in an administrative decision. An Order of the Supreme Court...

Follow us

The Bombay High Court directed the Commissioner of Customs, Airport Special Cargo Commissionerate to handover feeding tubes imported from the United States of America to the Petitioner. The tubes are for cancer survivors who are unable to eat without these tubes. The reason for their inability is due to a surgery they undergo.

Justice SJ Kathawalla and Justice NR Borkar heard the writ petition filed by Samir Patel. He is the person who sought the release of the parcel. The parcel was containing ‘Osmolite Nutrio N-Food’. These were for those who were tube feeding patients.

Facts of the Case 

In December 2016, the petitioner was diagnosed with oral cancer. The petitioner’s intake of nutrients is only possible with a feeding tube. These feeding tubes are required to be imported from the USA. The petitioner imported four boxes of such feeding tubes from the US. The tubes imported through the DHL Courier Agency. However, the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Air Cargo Complex did not allow these tubes. He kept the said packets on the grounds unclear to the petitioner.

Arguments by the Parties 

Senior Advocate Venkatesh Dhond appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh appeared on behalf of respondent authorities. The respondent authorities include the Commissioner of Customs, Airport Special Cargo Commissionerate.

Firstly, ASG Singh sought to join the aforesaid Commissioner. He was going to join as a respondent in the matter which was earlier allowed. Then, the Court directed DHL to file the Bill of Entry. The bill was to be filed with the Commissioner of Customs, Airport Special Cargo Commissionerate. The Bill of Entry was to file in the next hour. The Court asked ASG Singh to forward the email address of the Commissioner to the petitioner.

Court’s Decision

Court asked the petitioners to fill up Form No.7 (for Customs Duty Exemption certificate). Moreover, the Court asked to forward it to the Commissioner of Customs. The Court directed the Commissioner to process the documents received. The Court directed to ensure that tubes reach to the petitioner within 24 hours.

Next Hearing

The petitioner contends in the Court that the said feeding tubes are not available in India. They also add that there is also no alternative available. Furthermore, the petitioner has a stock of the feeding tubes, which will last only for a few days. The above matter will now be heard on June 22 at 11 AM.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

 

Latest News

Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Judgment which said Groping without Skin Contact Not Sexual Assault under POCSO

The National Commission for Women (NCW) has challenged the Bombay High Court judgment where it stated that groping a child’s breasts without any ‘skin-to-skin’ contact will not be considered as sexual assault as defined under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Supreme Court Classifying Employees Based on Educational Qualifications for Promotion or Appointment Is Neither Violative of Article 14 nor of Article 16

This case concerns the dispute relating to the classification of employees belonging to the homogenous group based on educational qualifications. Brief facts of the case The...

Supreme Court Refuses To Transfer Petitions To Itself Related To ‘Love Jihad’ Filed in Allahabad High Court

On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the plea which was filed by the UP Government regarding the transfer of all the pleas challenging the ordinance the court passed, from Allahabad High Court to the Supreme Court.

Bombay HC Nagpur Bench Holds That Groping a Girl Without ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Is Not Sexual Assault

The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court acquitted a man charged under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and convicted him of a minor offence under IPC stating that there was no direct physical contact.

Delhi High Court Restrains Publication of Book on “the Ryan School Murder”

The Order had come in an injunction application filed by the St. Xavier's Education Trust in Delhi. The Plaintiff sought ad-interim restraining order on...

Supreme Court Closed Proceeding in Case of “in Re: Advocate on Record Includes a Proprietary Firm Etc.”

Brief facts of the case Emails from the Petitioner resulted in an administrative decision. An Order of the Supreme Court has drawn up the issue...

Supreme Court To Hear Female Army Officers Plea on Non-Implementation of the Permanent Commission

Claiming that its order granting Permanent Commission to women in the army’s non-combat support units on par with the male counterparts was not implemented well, many Women Army officers have approached the Supreme Court.

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -