Bombay HC Imposes Stay on Government’s Notification Fixing Rates for Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals

Must Read

High Court of Gauhati Hears PIL for Non-Implementation of Funds for Various Schemes in Nagaland

Introduction A PIL filed by the Global Trust Club raising the issue concerned with the non-implementation of schemes such as...

Public Money Recovery Cannot Wait in Perpetuity To Suit Convenience of Particular Borrower: Calcutta High Court

Excerpt The Bench of Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of the Calcutta High Court on 22nd January 2021, ruled that the recovery...

Supreme Court Refuses To Provide Protection From Arrest To ‘Tandav’ Team

The Supreme Court did not give any relief to actors and the makers of Tandav, an Amazon Prime Video Web Series who appealed for protection against their arrest. At least three cases have been filed in Uttar Pradesh against the makers of the series for the inappropriate depiction of the UP police, deities, and adverse portrayal of the character of PM. States like Maharashtra, Karnataka, Bihar, Delhi, and Chandigarh also have similar cases filed.

Transferring Employee Without Justification To Another Place Where Post Does Not Exist Is Illegal and Arbitrary; Should Be Set Aside: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Excerpt A single-judge Bench consisting of Honorable Justice M. Satyanarayana Murthy gave orders on the writ petition filed by the...

Supreme Court Extends Protection To CM Yediyurappa Against Arrest in a Corruption Case

The Supreme Court on Monday protected the Chief Minister of Karnataka and the former minister of industries Murugesh Nirani from the arrest pertaining to a case of alleged forgery over the withdrawal of approval given to a piece of land.

Centre’s Resistance To Draft EIA in All Vernacular Languages Questioned by the Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court said that it cannot understand why the Centre is refusing from translating the Environment Impact Act (EIA) into all 22 vernacular languages mentioned in the eighth schedule of the Constitution.

Follow us

A petition challenging Government Orders that regulated the prices for the treatment of patients in private hospitals was instituted in the Bombay HC’s Nagpur Bench. The Court imposed a stay on the aforesaid notification.

Background

The State Government issued notifications dated 30th April 2020 and 21st May 2020 to regulate the prices for the treatment of COVID & non-COVID patients in private hospitals. By order dated 4th June 2020, the Municipal Commissioner extended its operation up to 31st August 2020. By a subsequent notification dated 31st August 2020, the State Government extended the operation of the previous notifications up to 31st November 2020. On 15th September 2020, the Court had passed an order directing the State Government to explain its competence in fixing the rates for non-COVID patients in private hospitals failing which the Court would impose a stay on the aforesaid portion of the notification. The present hearing arises out of a pursis filed by the State along with a copy of the praecipe moved before the Chief Justice on 22nd September 2020.

State Government’s Submissions

The State Government submitted that the notification dated 31st August 2020 issued by the State Government had not been challenged in the present petition. It also urged that any separate order passed by the Municipal Commissioner in this regard has also not been challenged in the present petition.

Further, in the affidavit filed by the State, the circumstances under which such notification was issued have been explained which ought to be considered. The Additional Government Pleader requests the Court to schedule the next hearing for the matter on 29th September 2020 so the question related to competency can be argued.

Submissions by the Amicus Curiae

Shri Subodh Dharmadhikari – learned Senior Advocate acting as Amicus Curiae urged that if the notification dated 21st May 2020 has been extended by a subsequent notification then it would be a mere formality to place on record the subsequent notification. Therefore, the challenge in substance for the earlier notification would survive for consideration for the court.

Court’s Observations

The Court noted the propriety of taking up the matter when the Government Pleader had placed the praecipe filed before the Chief Justice before this Bench. However, in light of the order passed on 15th September 2020 where the Court assured the Petitioners interim relief if no response was received from the State, it is necessary to pass relevant interim orders.

Court’s Decision

Given the observations made above, the Court scheduled the next hearing for this matter on 29th September 2020 to enable the State Government to move the praecipe before the Hon’ble Chief Justice and argue the matter on merits. The Court directed the stay of operations on Clause (4) which fixed the price of non-COVID treatments in private hospitals in the notification dated 21st May 2020 issued by the State Government.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

High Court of Gauhati Hears PIL for Non-Implementation of Funds for Various Schemes in Nagaland

Introduction A PIL filed by the Global Trust Club raising the issue concerned with the non-implementation of schemes such as Swachh Bharat Mission in Nagaland...

Public Money Recovery Cannot Wait in Perpetuity To Suit Convenience of Particular Borrower: Calcutta High Court

Excerpt The Bench of Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of the Calcutta High Court on 22nd January 2021, ruled that the recovery of public money cannot wait...

Supreme Court Refuses To Provide Protection From Arrest To ‘Tandav’ Team

The Supreme Court did not give any relief to actors and the makers of Tandav, an Amazon Prime Video Web Series who appealed for protection against their arrest. At least three cases have been filed in Uttar Pradesh against the makers of the series for the inappropriate depiction of the UP police, deities, and adverse portrayal of the character of PM. States like Maharashtra, Karnataka, Bihar, Delhi, and Chandigarh also have similar cases filed.

Transferring Employee Without Justification To Another Place Where Post Does Not Exist Is Illegal and Arbitrary; Should Be Set Aside: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Excerpt A single-judge Bench consisting of Honorable Justice M. Satyanarayana Murthy gave orders on the writ petition filed by the Petitioner seeking to issue a...

Supreme Court Extends Protection To CM Yediyurappa Against Arrest in a Corruption Case

The Supreme Court on Monday protected the Chief Minister of Karnataka and the former minister of industries Murugesh Nirani from the arrest pertaining to a case of alleged forgery over the withdrawal of approval given to a piece of land.

Centre’s Resistance To Draft EIA in All Vernacular Languages Questioned by the Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court said that it cannot understand why the Centre is refusing from translating the Environment Impact Act (EIA) into all 22 vernacular languages mentioned in the eighth schedule of the Constitution.

Section 125 of CrPC Was Enacted To Achieve Social Justice for Women, Child and Infirm Parents: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court, while terming the statutory mandate for a financially capable man to maintain his wife, children and parents, a social legislature, it said that the proceeding under it is of a summary nature and is aimed at providing quick relief to the person in dire need.

Federal Court Rules That 1992 Term Limit Amendments To Michigan Constitution Were Lawful

Excerpt The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan last Wednesday ruled in favour of the Offices of the Secretary of State for...

Maryland’s County Circuit Court Sentences Sean Urbanski To Life in Prison for Murder of 2Lt. Richard Collins III

Excerpt On the 14th of January 2021, Prince George’s County Circuit Court in Maryland (US) sentenced Sean C. Urbanski to life in prison with the...

“Dismissal Without Inquiry Is Justified if Employee Did Not Prove Minimum Working Period”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the dispute relating to the termination of an employee without any disciplinary inquiry. Brief facts of the case The Respondent, Smt. Sureshwati was...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -