The Ban on Online Gaming by the Tamil Nadu Government – The Right Way Forward?

Must Read

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Follow us

With fantasy gaming and other such ‘online games’ gaining popularity, Telangana was the first state to expressly ban online gaming in the recent past. Tamil Nadu has followed the suit by passing an ordinance titled the Tamil Nadu Gaming and Police Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020 (“Ordinance”) dated 20 November 2020. The Ordinance amends the Tamil Nadu Gaming Act, 1930, the Chennai City Policy Act, 1888, and the Tamil Nadu District Police Act, 1859.

The Reason Behind the Ban

The Madurai bench of the Madras High Court heard public interest litigation concerning the ban of certain online games. The Court had made specific mention of the loss of human lives owing to online gambling and had also stated that it was considering banning online games. This remark was passed specifically owing to multiple cases of suicide that were reported on account of indulgence in online gaming and suffering heavy financial losses.

The Amendment to the Tamil Nadu Gaming Act, 1930 Broken Down

Through the Ordinance, new definitions have been introduced and existing definitions have been amended. The definitions amended/introduced by the Ordinance include: ‘common gaming house’, ‘gaming’ and ‘instruments of gaming’. The critical ‘gamechanger’ seems to be the inclusion of a ban on wagering or betting in cyberspace.

In banning wagering or betting in cyberspace, the amendment appears to completely do away with the need to scrutinize whether an alleged ‘game’ is a ‘game of skill’ or otherwise. This test has been applied by Courts throughout the country time and again. Instead, the Ordinance puts in place a ban on wagering or betting in cyberspace including by playing rummy, poker, or any other game.

The Ordinance states that those found gaming shall be punished with a fine of INR 5,000 and may be sentenced to a six-month long term of imprisonment. Persons that run/keep such gaming houses open shall be punished with a fine of INR 10,000 and may be sentenced to imprisonment for up to two years. The electronic transfer of funds for wagering or betting as well as the distribution of winnings or prizes in the form of money or otherwise has been expressly banned.

Thoughts on the Ban

While the intention behind the ban appears well-founded, that is, to safeguard the interests of citizens against the evils of online gambling, the measures taken appear to lack the sound application of mind. The Ordinance leaves several questions unanswered, for example, manifesting as the clear lack of a definition of ‘wagering’ and ‘betting’.

In the absence of clear definitions and on account of clearly imposing a ban on rummy, poker, and ‘any other game’, the Ordinance seems extremely ambiguous. From a reading of the bare text, the position of the judiciary on ‘games of skill’ also seems categorically cast aside. Several other games played online may now also be brought under the purview of this amendment/Ordinance contrary to the intention of the Ordinance.

The Ordinance may have the right intent, it does not, in its current form, have the right solution. The implementation of the Ordinance may lead to an absurd manifestation where the baby is thrown with the bathwater.

This Article is written by Karthik Jayakumar. Karthik Jayakumar is the founding partner of K Legal, a law firm currently based in Chennai. He graduated from the School of Excellence in Law, Chennai. His practise areas include M&A, private equity, venture capital, start-up and general corporate advisory. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -