Tribunals Archives

Dr S.M Kantikar, a member of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission decided the revision petition filed by the Complainant against the Order of the State Commission.

Amita Pandove, Information Commissioner decided the Second Appeal sent by the Appellant to the Central Information Commission.

Author: Alan V Avneesh Amita Padova, Information Commissioner had decided the complaint filed by the Complainant. In this order, the Tribunal had checked the validity

Justice Venugopal M. and Justice V.P Singh check whether there can be any kind of interference made by the Adjudicated Authority with the commercial wisdom of COC in the order dated 24th February 2021.

The Tribunal had examined as to whether the Adjudicating Authority gave an opportunity to the Appellant to rectify his errors in the Order passed on 13th December 2019.

The current appeal filed by the assessee was against an order made by the Division Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).

On 12th May 2021, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal decided the case concerning the breach of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016.

The present appeal made by the Appellant is about whether the order made by the Tribunal on 30th September 2018 needs any kind of rectification.

The Tribunal had decided whether the Assessee is entitled to the adjustments of TDS. It had also decided the validity of the order passed by ld. CIT(A).

Introduction Vanaja N. Sarna, Information Commissioner, decided the Second Appeal filed by the Appellant. The Information Commission had addressed whether the CPIO should have responded