Excerpt The Delhi High Court had quashed an FIR (First Information Report) registered against an engineering student. This was done under the Arms Act after
Excerpt In the present case, two petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India were filed where the orders under challenge, dated 22.12.2020 were such
Excerpt The Delhi High Court recently observed that litigation was similar to the dramas/shows on Over-The-Top (OTT) platforms. This observation followed the opportunity to watch
The Supreme Court in a recent judgment, while disposing of the appeal arising out of Motor Accident Compensation Claim observed ‘Advocates cannot throwaway legal rights or enter into arrangements which are understood to be contrary to law. The claim was filed by the heirs of a deceased couple who died in a road accident.
The Bombay High Court ruled that using the name of God to sell any article claiming that it had supernatural powers is illegal. The court added that it falls under the Maharashtra prevention and eradication of Human sacrifice and other inhuman, evil, and Aghori practices and black magic act.
The Delhi High Court adjourned the hearing on a plea of a medical student to January 28. The plea was concerning a certificate that bars the medical student from taking admission in medical courses in the disability category.
On Wednesday, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has refused to entertain a petition which sought a direction from the court to the poll panel to stop the use of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) in elections, saying that the High court should be approached first in this case.
The Karnataka High Court on Monday has struck down Karnataka Parliamentary Secretaries Salaries, Allowances and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1963 which was previously amended in the year 1999. The Court said that the Karnataka State Legislature had no legislative power to pass the Karnataka Parliamentary Secretaries Salaries, Allowances, and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1963.
Excerpt: The writ petition was filed by the petitioner before this court to issue any writ, direction or order for quashing and setting aside the
The Bar Council of India, while answering the question, “Should a judge have a prior experience of Advocacy in order to be effective?”, said ‘Yes’ and therefore, it further plans on moving the Supreme Court to seek that a minimum of 3-year practice at the Bar to be made mandatory to become a judicial official at the Subordinate Judiciary Level.
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
