Calcutta High Court: Competition and Inclusiveness Are the Very Spirits of a Transparent Tender Process
Case: M/s Srishaila Constructions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India and others [WPA No. 6334 of 2020; IA No: CAN 1 of 2020] The Calcutta
Home » The Courtroom » Page 76
Case: M/s Srishaila Constructions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India and others [WPA No. 6334 of 2020; IA No: CAN 1 of 2020] The Calcutta
The Court directed that because no illegality was committed by the respondent authority in canceling the license of the petitioner of fair price shop, the
Case Name: N. Vijayakumar vs. State of Tamil Nadu [CRIMINAL APPEAL Nos. 100-101 OF 2021] The Supreme Court, in the judgment dated 3 February 2021,
Both the petitions arose from the award passed by Labour Court, Ahmedabad dated 28.5.2007, whereby the Labour Court had directed the employer-petitioner to reinstate the
Case Name: Sunita Agrawal vs. Bhanwarlal and Another [Civil Appeal No. 301/2021] Supreme Court on 1st February 2021, took into its consideration a case related
This case concerns the matter of delay in granting remission to the convicts who have completed their sentence of 14 years.
The letter patent appeal has been filed under clause 15 of Letter Patent against the judgment and order dated 10.08.20 passed by learned Single Judge in which petition was dismissed in the case of Divyeshkumar Ashokbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat C/LPA/538/2020.
The application was filed by Hardik Damor and another accused Jagdish Parmar. Hardik Damor is a suspended mamlatdar and Jagdish Parmar is his agent. A mamlatdar is a gazetted officer of the State Government and is considered to be the head of the taluk.
Munawar Faruqui along with four others were arrested and put into judicial custody from 1st January 2021. The reason; a BJP MLA’s son allegedly overheard him practising jokes for his set. The jokes were supposedly indecent and degrading to Hindu deities and the Union Home Minister Amit Shah.
The UPSC test was held on October 4th 2020. Most of the candidates were last time candidates. All of them, collectively filed a petition before the Supreme Court seeking a second attempt. It was contended in the petition that, “preparations for their preliminary examination to be held on October 4, 2020, were affected due to the coronavirus epidemic.”
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.



