Police Authorities Cannot Deny Certified Copy of FIR, Except In Some Sensitive Cases
TitashBanik v. State of Chattisgarh (2016, SCC online Chh 1623, decided on 23.12.2016) FACTS A FIR was registered against the Petitioner under the prevention of
Home » The Courtroom » Page 314
TitashBanik v. State of Chattisgarh (2016, SCC online Chh 1623, decided on 23.12.2016) FACTS A FIR was registered against the Petitioner under the prevention of
Church of North India trust Association V Union of India (2016 SCC OnLine All 1185, decided on 19.12.2016) FACTS In the present case the petitioner,
Mohit v. Union of India (2016, SCC OnLine P&H 10157, decided on 16/11/2016) FACTS The marriage of the Petitioner’s natural parents was dissolved by a
Chhattisgarh High Court on its own Motion v. State of Maharashtra (SCC OnLine 2016 Bom 8426 decided on 10.09.2016) FACTS Rajesh Kumar Agrawal has lodged
K.S. Srivastava v.Union of India [SCC Online Del 6149, Decided On 1.12.2016] FACTS In a case relating to maintainability of Writ petition on the ground
Heena Nikhil Dharia v. Kokilaben Kirti kumar Nayak [SCC Online On 9.12.2016] FACTS In this case the dispute is related to the estate of Kirtik
Bar Council of Gujrat v. Jalpa Pradeepbhai Desai [SCC Online Guj 5080. Decided On 25.12.2016] FACTS The respondent petitioner applied for an appeal, who has
State of Tamil Nadu v. K. Balu [SCC Online SC 1487, Decided On 15.12.2016] FACTS The Apex Court was concerned over 1 lakh fatalities every
Rani Mistry v. The State Of West Bengal SCC Online Cal 8283, Decided On 30.11.2016 FACTS The Court was considering a bail plea of a
Case – Shyam Narayan Chouskey v. Union of India Facts A PIL was filed in Supreme Court of India to clarify when the national anthem
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.