Different petitioners have filed several petitions claiming the pensions to the teaching and non-teaching employees of Dibrugarh University. The Respondents blamed several withstanding issues as an excuse for not paying the required amount timely.
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court heard the Petitioner of the present case dealing with Article 21 of the Constitution of India and said that they shall be allowed to live their married life the way they desire as guaranteed by the Constitution.
In this order, the Tribunal had checked the validity of the complaint filed by the Complainant.
Heeralal Samariya, Information Commissioner decided the Second Appeal sent by the Appellant to the Central Information Commission.
Y.K. Sinha, Chief information commissioner decided the Second Appeal (No. CIC/SPNPA/A/2018/637591) filed by the Appellant.
Dr S.M Kantikar, a member of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission decided the revision petition filed by the Complainant against the Order of the State Commission.
Amita Pandove, Information Commissioner decided the Second Appeal sent by the Appellant to the Central Information Commission.
The Tribunal will decide as to whether the Adjudicated Authority was right to dismiss the promotional expenses of the Assessee in the order dated 13th September 2019.
The Petitioner filed this petition against the order of the State government not granting an exemption from imposition of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on oxygen concentrators imported into the country, as a gift, for personal use.
A single judge bench consisting of Honorable Justice C. Praveen Kumar passed an order on the Writ Petition no. 10145 of 2021. The Writ Petition was filed to seek issuance of a Writ of mandamus declaring the actions of the Respondents in demolishing a residential house, without following the due procedure of law, as illegal and incorrect.
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
