Himachal Pradesh High Court Reiterates that Bail Is Rule and Jail Is an Exception
The Petitioner in the present case, Tanishque Uppal v State of Himachal Pradesh, is accused of Theft with other relevant sections of IPC related to theft.
Home » The Courtroom » Page 166
The Petitioner in the present case, Tanishque Uppal v State of Himachal Pradesh, is accused of Theft with other relevant sections of IPC related to theft.
A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition. Private unaided minority educational institutions filed this challenging a Calcutta High Court order.
A petition was filed by a man detained (detenue) as a “dangerous person” under the Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 (PASA) against the order
A Full Bench comprising of Justice S.A Bobde, Justice A.S Bopanna, and Justice V. Ramasubramanian held that the judicial officers cannot club their experience as
The court sentenced seven militants involved in the 2014 shooting to death and three others to 25-year jail terms. This decision comes in succession on
Two PILs to regulate the ongoing media trial in light of the death of Sushant Singh Rajput were filed before the Bombay High Court and
In the case of Ramesh Namdeo Naikwade v. the State of Maharashtra, a division bench of Justice S.S. Shinde and Justice M.S. Karnik of the
A Writ Petition was filed by the Bombay Parsi Panchayat to open places of worship for followers of the Parsi Religion or allow them to
According to Registrar General Rai Chattopadhyay, the Calcutta High Court has agreed to increase judicial activity from yesterday, September 8 and has also ordered the
Orissa HC sets aside 34-year-old judgment convicting two persons under Sec. 304 Part II & Sec. 324 of Indian Penal Code. The names of the
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.