Jharkhand HC Allows Appeal Against the Common Judgment of Conviction and Sentence
A criminal appeal was filed against the common Judgment of Conviction and Order of Sentence dated 09.10.2015 passed by the Special Judge, C.B.I., Dhanbad as
Home » The Courtroom » Page 119
A criminal appeal was filed against the common Judgment of Conviction and Order of Sentence dated 09.10.2015 passed by the Special Judge, C.B.I., Dhanbad as
In light of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, a Full Bench of The Supreme Court ordered the installation of CCTV recording systems in all
The Karnataka High Court held that the accused, who is ‘absconding’ and declared as a ‘proclaimed offender’, can not be granted anticipatory bail. The Court
In the matter of Nimay Sah v. State of Jharkhand, the Supreme considered the Appeal filed by the Accused/Appellant concerning the charges filed under Section
The criminal revision petition filed by the petitioners against the Judgment dated 02.05.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VII, Palamau at Daltonganj in Criminal
This case discussed the eligibility of an organization to be governed under provisions of the Employees’ Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. Brief Facts
The present suit, along with the Judge’s Order was moved ex-parte. The urgent relief sought was the arrest of the Defendant Vessel, on an apprehension
The Appellant/Accused was aggrieved and dissatisfied by the judgment passed by the Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad, in this judgment the High Court dismissed
Writ Petitions were filed by Miss V. Shanti and Mr G. Ravichandran, challenging a common order of the Madras High Court dated 05 November 20.
Telangana High Court declared, in Mohammed Gulam Manjur vs The State of Telangana on 30 November 2020, that the child should be protected and should
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.



