High Court Archives

The single-judge bench comprising of Justice Suresh Kumar Kait on analysis of all the evidence presented to him concluded that the gunshot wound that was the cause of death, was not a close shot rather was fired from a distance, as the bullet had entered the body from the left and exited from the right.

In the case hearing, the advocate who appeared had not worn his neckband. The High Court took cognizance of the same and stated that the dress code was not properly followed and passed an order against the advocate.

The petitioner had filed an application on 13th February 2021, in order to get permission to conduct an awareness drive through Madurai in a van in connection with the building of the Ram temple.

Excerpt The Calcutta High Court on 19th February 2021, dismissed the petition filed by the Indian Secular Front (Petitioner) to grant the holding of a

Excerpt The Calcutta High Court on 19th February 2021, disposed of WPA No. 10088 by remarking that since the  Petitioner does not possess the certificate

The petition says: The move to manufacture the said vaccine commercially and distribute it to the general public as a safe vaccine is totally dishonest and goes against the WHO guidelines, as also the safety norms laid down by the 2019 Rules.

The Additional Chief Metropolitan Chief Magistrate Aakash Jain who heard the case remanded Disha Ravi to 3 more days of judicial custody. This is following her 5 days of remand in police custody.

This case concerns a bail application of a person accused of an offence of sedition under Section 124A IPC. 

Advocate Nagamani who filed the PIL in the High Court had prayed for the filing of an FIR and a judicial enquiry in the said incident. It is stated that after the filing of the PIL the couple had received death threats from the police department.