High Court Archives

Bombay High court Bench at Goa, on Thursday, directed the Goa Administrative department of the State to make sure that “no persons are permitted entry into the State without a negativity certificate issued within 72 hours from the time the travellers seek entry into the State without a negativity certificate issued within 72 hours from the time the travellers seek entry into the State.”

A petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing and setting aside the Orders passed by the Special Secretary (Appeals) Revenue Department Collector, Ahmedabad which is allowed by the honourable Court.

The Division Bench led by Chief Justice Arup Kumar Goswami and Justice C. Praveen Kumar responded to the PIL filed against the State health authorities on their lack of management methods during the pandemic.

The Supreme Court heard and decided on an appeal against the judgment of Bombay High Court regarding a tenancy dispute. The current CJI gave the judgment on this appeal.

In a recent matter related to a government servant’s legal heir and release of family pension, the Telangana High Court had observed that the second marriage would not be considered valid and legal even though it was registered in the Marriage Registrar office.

Brief Facts  The Petitioner was appointed as a TGT (Trained graduate teacher) in 1990 in the Respondent’s institution. At the time of promotion, 2 available

The Tripura High Court gave a verdict in WP(C) No.1256 of 2019. The Court reasoned that for stepping up the pay of the juniors to that of the senior both need to be of the same cadre. The Court dismissed the petition filed by some assistant teachers.

The Bombay High Court on Wednesday quashed an FIR against Sunaina Holey, a Navi Mumbai resident who had been booked under SECTION 153A of the IPC, for reposting a video along with a comment criticizing the gathering of migrant workers outside Bandra Masjid during the lockdown on 14th April 2020. 

The Petitioner was having trouble getting an e-pass that restricted the movement due to the lockdown order issued on 19th April 2021. Thus, he filed an application seeking exemption from filing affirmed affidavits.

The Appellant was convicted of the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 498(A), read with 34 of IPC of Indian Penal Code. The Original Accused Nos. 2 to 4 were also held guilty under Section 498(A) read with 34 of IPC. This appeal is challenging the correctness of the Order passed by the Trial Court.