The Gujarat High Court has issued a ‘Rule’ and ‘Notice’ to the State for the interim relief. Justice Sangeeta Visheen passed this order in the case of Dhaval Rajnikant Patel v. the State of Gujarat, 2020. Brief Facts of the Case The petitioner filed this petition for quashing the FIR
In the United Nurses Association Through Its President v. Union of India and Ors. Herein, the Association filed a writ petition. The Petition pleaded the Court to direct the Central Government to bring back people stuck overseas. Brief Facts of the Case The plea was to bring back 56 pregnant
Delhi High Court on Friday 23 May 2020 held that the 2018 Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act replaces Section 13(1)(d) of the original Act which did not work. The bench of Justice Vibhu Bakhru held that the purpose of the amendment was to provide for the actions of a public
The Gujarat High Court on 13.03.2020 registered a suo motu Public Interest Litigation. The PIL was on the ‘Precautionary Measures in the Wake of the Pandemic of Coronavirus COVID-19’ (Suo Motu v. State of Gujarat, R/WPPIL/42/2020). On 11.05.2020, the Court took cognizance of four news items published on that date.
The Gujarat High Court has made the display of the full name of the participants during Zoom Video Conferencing (VC) hearing mandatory. If the full proper name is not displayed, then such persons will be prohibited from entering the VC hearing session. The High Court has been hearing matters through
Bombay High Court on 22.03.2020 had asked the Centre to inform the number of passengers from different nations who tested COVID positive. This applied to those who were positive after landing in India and not before taking the flight. The stranded passengers are from the USA. The government evacuated the
We have been spending most of our time on the internet these days. The recent controversy that has emerged is of a new class war called “Tik Tok Vs YouTube”. In the times when the entire world is fighting a pandemic, twitter trends with the hashtag #JusticeforCarryMinati. It started with
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court denied interfering with an NGT order. The order directed LG Polymers to deposit Rs. 50 crores for the destruction caused by a gas leak. This gas leak took place in Visakhapatnam on May 7th. Here, around 12 people were killed and many were critically injured.
On 29.12.1999, the Vice-President and the Head of the Establishment were murdered inside the factory premises. To identify those involved in the murder, the establishment constituted a committee. Sri Ajay Sharma, who conducted the Inquiry, submitted his report on 21.1.2000. The report identified Respondent Pramod Kumar along with Ajay Kumar,
In M/S Kanak Exports vs. Union of India and Ors., M/s Adani Export Ltd. opposed the order issued by Respondent No.3 dated 28.12.2017. The order held that the Petitioner was ineligible under the DFCE to get any benefit. The Duty-Free Credit Entitlement Scheme (DFCE) is given to a merchant-exporter or
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
