Suhani Bardia

In this case, a woman got justice after 26 years of her death. The people responsible for her suicide and for torturing her for dowry were punished appropriately. The justice was delayed but it occurred.

The High Court of Patna ordered the authority to make timely decisions and if not, the Court would have the right to release the confiscated property without any further proceeding.

In continuation to the Laxmanpur bathe massacre, there were mass killings in Senari but in the case, all the accused were set free due to lack of clear evidence against them.

The Court did not interfere in the decision of superannuation by the company authority but ordered that the excess amount paid cannot be recovered.

Petitioner claimed that the selection committee of APDCL was biased but the court held the judgement in the favour of APDCL and gave them clean chit.

The High Court in the case Sri Kanu Chandra Das Vs. Sri Joydeb Dey upheld the decision of lower courts, and held the accused accountable for civil wrong and not criminally after considering the facts of the case.

An accused of raping a girl child aged three and half years was sentenced to jail for rigorous imprisonment of twenty years and a fine of rupees five thousand. Facts of the case The victim along with her mother went to attend a function. The victim’s mother while entering into

Case: Ratan Sarkar Versus The State of Tripura Excerpt  The High Court of Tripura after thoroughly going through the evidence and witnesses upheld the decision of the Sessions Judge and held the Accused guilty of assault and grievous hurt. Facts  This Appeal was filed in response to the Judgment passed

Case- Madan Kumar Saha Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited Excerpt  In an appeal filed under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 the High Court of Calcutta upheld the decision by the Arbitrator. The decision by the Arbitrator was, although not binding, the court decided not to interfere. Facts  The company Indian

Excerpt The High Court of Jharkhand sustained the decision of Sessions Court and held the Accused guilty after closely examining the Evidence under section 498a and 306 of IPC and exempted him under Dowry Prohibition Act. Facts of the case This Appeal is filed against the judgment passed by the