Stuti Dave

In the matter of Pravasi Legal Cell & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors, the Supreme Court heard multiple writ petitions seeking the same relief, therefore allowing all the cases to be heard jointly, which were then disposed of by this common verdict. Brief Facts of the Case In

An SLP was filed before the Supreme Court. The SC had set aside the order of the Allahabad HC in which the court had granted anticipatory bail to a government advocate concerning a rape case lodged against him by a young lawyer. Brief facts of the case Shailendra Singh Chauhan,

A petition was filed before the Supreme Court, seeking to issue directions to the State Government of Madhya Pradesh and the High Court of MP to increase the age of superannuation of members of Subordinate Judicial officers to 62. Brief facts of the case A writ petition was filed under

In the present matter entitled Kudrat Sandhu v. Union of India & Anr., the applicant filed an application to sought a direction for the extension of his service until the regular appointments are made. After analysis of the circumstances, the Supreme Court had disposed of the applicant. Brief Facts of

In the matter of Swami Vishwanand v Union Of India, an appeal was filed before the Apex Court sought permission from the court to allow the applicant to perform morning and evening rituals in the temple. The Supreme court passed the order in his favour. Brief Facts of the Case Swami

In the matter of Parvinder Kansal v. State of NCT of Delhi, a criminal appeal was filed before the Supreme Court which sought enhancement of the sentence imposed for an offence under Section 364A read with Section 34 of IPC. The appeal was dismissed by the court. Brief Facts of the

A PIL was filed by an advocate Dr Subhash Vijayran before the SC to declare that no freedom of speech and expression on court proceedings and judgments except to the extent of true and fair reporting. Brief facts of the case When a Division Bench of Rajasthan HC, ordered to

The Supreme Court passed the judgment related to the interpretation of the provisions of Section 6(1)(viii) of the Nanded Act 1956 in the matter of Sadar Bahginder Singh v. Sadar Manjieeth Singh. Brief Facts of the Case On 28th December 1951, the Sachkhand Hazuri Khalsa Diwas Association Society (Diwan) was