The order passed in M/s Vanilla Clean Power Pvt. Ltd. & M/s Ivy Eco-Energy India Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Inox Wind Infrastructure Services Ltd by the Single Judge Bench of Justice Yogesh Khanna, while hearing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 directed a wind-power generator
The Division Bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice C Hari Shankar dismissed the writ petition (Naresh Kumar v. Director of Education & Anr.) seeking exemption of payment of fees, including tuition fees, to schools during the period of lockdown. Brief facts of the case In response to the
The High Court of Delhi deciding the case of Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. v. Vedanta Limited & Anr restrained Vedanta Limited and others from invoking and encashing eight bank guarantees against Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. regarding the integrated development contract in Rajasthan holding the nationwide lockdown due to coronavirus pandemic,
High Court of Delhi has disposed the writ petition and allowed passing of bail orders by Delhi High Court or any Court subordinate to it on or before the stipulated time, for under trial prisoners to be released on bail without the condition of the furnishing surety bond and instead
Supreme Court has allowed the writ petition (Shashank Deo Sudhi v UOI) for modification of order intended to make testing in private Labs of COVID-19 free for other categories of economically weaker sections of the society. Brief facts of the case: The petitioner, Mr Shashank Deo Sudhi has prayed for
The Special Leave Petition was filed before the Supreme Court of India to quash the Impugned orders issued by the Delhi High Court for holding that the satisfaction order was recorded by the Assessing Officer and complaisance of Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Brief facts of the case
Supreme Court has dismissed the writ petition stating that no ground was found entertaining this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution, challenging the judicial review powers of the President of India exercised under Article 72 of the Constitution of India. Brief facts of the case The petitioner, Pawan
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
