Sakshi Rathore

The Hon’ble SC heard the case regarding allegations of sedition, promotion of communal enmity etc. against Vinod Dua. The Bench consisted of Hon’ble Justice UU Lalit and Hon’ble Justice Vineet Sareen. Brief Facts Vinod Dua is facing FIRs from multiple states including Maharashtra, West Bengal, Himachal Pradesh, etc with regards

On 19th August 2020, a Supreme Court Bench comprising of Hon’ble Chief Justice of India, S.A. Bobde, Hon’ble Justice A.S. Bopanna and Hon’ble Justice V. Ramasubramanian heard the case of Ghanshyam Upadhyay v State of UP. Brief Facts  The Petitioner filed a Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution

On 17th August, the Supreme Court heard the case of AGR dues. The Bench comprised of Hon’ble Justice Arun Mishra, Hon’ble Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon’ble Justice M.R. Shah. Facts of the Case  The current hearing is concerning the question of whether selling of Spectrum as a part of

On 14th August 2020, the Hon’ble Supreme Court heard the case of M. Radha Hari Seshu v State of Telangana. The bench comprised of Hon’ble Justice Ashok Bhushan, Hon’ble Justice R. Subhash Reddy and Hon’ble Justice M. R. Shah. Brief Facts of the Case A complaint registered against the Appellant

The Supreme Court in the case of Hari Krishna Mandir Trust Versus State of Maharashtra and others, rendered its judgment, headed by Justice Indira Banerjee. The judgment concerned the dismissal of a writ petition filed by the appellant that challenged the order in which the State Government refused to sanction

A division bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court heard the case of Medipol Pharmaceuticals India Pvt. Ltd. V Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research and Anr on 5th August, 2020. The bench comprised of Hon’ble Justice R.F. Nariman and Hon’ble Justice Navin Sinha. Brief facts of the Case

On 5th August, 2020, a division bench of the Supreme Court of India comprising Hon’ble Justice R.F. Nariman and Hon’ble Justice Navin Sinha heard the case of Shor v Union of India. The judges have interpreted section 2 of the United Provinces Prisoners Release on Probation Act, 1938. Brief Facts

The petitioners have challenged the constitutional validity of The Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019 before Supreme Court in the case of Janhit abhiyan v Union of India & Ors. On 5th August the court referred the matter to a 5 judge bench since it involves a substantial