Coram for Worcester v. Georgia Chief Justice John Marshall, Justice William Johnson, Justice Gabriel Duvall, Justice Joseph Story, Justice Smith Thompson, Justice John McLean (concurrence), and Justice Henry Baldwin (dissenting). Facts of the case of Worcester v. Georgia During the 1820s and 1830s, the State of Georgia relentlessly pursued the
The Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge, Plaintiffs in Error v. The Proprietors of the Warren Bridge, and Others (1837) Coram of Charles River Bridge v Warren Bridge Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, Justice Joseph Story, Justice Smith Thompson, Justice John McLean, Justice Henry Baldwin, Justice James M. Wayne, and
Coram of Gibbons v. Ogden Chief Justice John Marshall, Justice Bushrod Washington, Justice William Johnson, Thomas Todd, Justice Gabriel Duvall, Justice Joseph Story, and Justice Smith Thompson. Note: Justice Smith Thompson took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Facts of the case of Gibbons v. Ogden
Coram for Marbury vs. Madison Chief Justice John Marshall, Justice William Cushing, Justice William Paterson, Justice Samuel Chase, Justice Bushrod Washington, and Justice Alfred Moore. Note: Due to illness, Justice William Cushing and Justice Alfred Moore did not attend the oral arguments or participate in the Court’s decision. Facts of
Excerpt Judges of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in a reparation order, awarded the victims of Congolese Warlord, Bosco Ntaganda, USD 30 million. Background Mr Bosco Ntaganda, also known as “Mr Terminator”, is a militia leader, who carried out a range of war crimes and crimes against humanity in the
Judges of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in a reparation order, awarded the victims of Congolese Warlord, Bosco Ntaganda, USD 30 million.
Judges of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in a reparation order, awarded the victims of Congolese Warlord, Bosco Ntaganda, USD 30 million.
Excerpt The Nablus Court of First Instance ruled that Lord Balfour’s declaration to support for a “national home for the Jewish people” violated international law and resulted in the consequences of “nakba”. The Court has called the British government to apologize to the State of Palestine and its people. Background
Excerpt The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) held that Hungary had violated the law in its treatment of a family of five asylum seekers, including three young children. The Iranian Afghan family was held in a Röszke transit zone for several months since 2017. Background A family of five,
The London Court delivered the verdict stating that the evidence against Modi was sufficient to merit order for extradition to India, where he is to face criminal charges for money laundering and fraud concerning the Punjab National Bank (PNB) scam.
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
