This case concerns a bail application of the petitioners who were accused of being involved in the Hindu-Muslim riots that took place in North-East Delhi, during the CAA protests. Brief facts of the case This is a bail application filed by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. read with Section
This case discussed whether the arbitration clause in a contract between the state instrumentality and a private developer bars the writ jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226.
This case concerns a bail application of a person accused of an offence of sedition under Section 124A IPC.
Excerpt This case concerns whether Section 10A introduced through the amendment can be retrospectively applied. Brief Facts The Appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was invoked to challenge the Decision and Order of the National Company Law Appellate Jurisdiction (NCLAT).
Excerpt This case concerns whether the High Court erred in reversing the findings of the trial Court in exercise of its powers under Section 378 of Cr. P.C. Brief Facts In the instant proceedings, a cheque was issued by the Appellant- M/s. Kalamani Tex & Anr. because of a certain
Excerpt This case concerns whether the appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration is maintainable against the order refusing to condone the delay in applying Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. Brief Facts This appeal was filed by the appellant (Chintels India Ltd.) because a Certificate was issued under Article
Excerpt This case concerns the dispute of whether the written statement/reply can be accepted by the consumer fora beyond the stipulated period of 45 days. Brief Facts This appeal was filed against the impugned order dated 04.09.2020 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (National Commission), by
This was a contempt petition against the promoters of FHHPL who did not adhere to the orders of the Court to maintain the status quo of the shares of the FHL held by FHHPL. Brief facts of the case A notice was issued on 11.08.2017 in Special Leave Petition, the
This case discussed the way the Central Government approached the Supreme Court without taking into consideration the statutory limitation.
This case concerned the dispute relating to the regularization of illegally occupied panchayat land by the villagers in the state of Haryana
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
