Alan V Avanesh

In this order, the Tribunal had checked the validity of the complaint filed by the Complainant.

Heeralal Samariya, Information Commissioner decided the Second Appeal sent by the Appellant to the Central Information Commission.

Y.K. Sinha, Chief information commissioner decided the Second Appeal (No.  CIC/SPNPA/A/2018/637591) filed by the Appellant.

Dr S.M Kantikar, a member of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission decided the revision petition filed by the Complainant against the Order of the State Commission.

Amita Pandove, Information Commissioner decided the Second Appeal sent by the Appellant to the Central Information Commission.

Author: Alan V Avneesh Amita Padova, Information Commissioner had decided the complaint filed by the Complainant. In this order, the Tribunal had checked the validity of the complaint filed by the Complainant. Facts  The Complainant filed an RTI Application on 12th April 2019 seeking information from the National Highways Authority

Justice Venugopal M. and Justice V.P Singh check whether there can be any kind of interference made by the Adjudicated Authority with the commercial wisdom of COC in the order dated 24th February 2021.

The Tribunal had examined as to whether the Adjudicating Authority gave an opportunity to the Appellant to rectify his errors in the Order passed on 13th December 2019.

The current appeal filed by the assessee was against an order made by the Division Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).