Akshay Sharma

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of the petitioner to be illegal and against the fundamental right to liberty given under Article 21. The Madras High Court on October 16th, 2020 declared in

A petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus to set aside the order of detention passed by the District Magistrate and to set the detenu at liberty. Facts of the Case In the case of Sathya vs. The Secretary

Madras High Court on 30th September 2020 directed the State Government to consider a representation made by students of the School of Excellence in Law (SOEL) against the levy of fees for college facilities not in use amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Facts of the Case The present writ petition has

In the case of All India Union Bank Officer vs Brajeshwar Sharma, a Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberately and willfully disobeying the final order of Madras High Court. On September 4th, 2020, The Court closed the petition and held it

In the case of Minor T Mohamed Humayun and Ors. v State of Tamil Nadu and Ors., on 20th August 2020, The Madras High Court has dismissed a batch of pleas challenging the procedure adopted by the Tamil Nadu government to evaluate the academic performance of Class X students amid the COVID-19

On 17th August, 2020, Madras High Court delivered order relating to a plea under Article 226, filed by the Service Bar Association (RBA) challenging the rules concerning the appointment and the terms of service governing the President and Members of the GSTAT that is the GSTAT (Appointment and Conditions of

The High Court delivered a common order for two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorari and to quash the impugned orders of the Labour Court. The High Court upheld the order of the Labour Court in the

The petitioner filed a civil revision petition in the High court Under Section 115 of CPC to set aside the order of the trial court. On August 6th 2020, the court allowed the petition even after a delay of 2492 days “in the interest of justice”. Brief Facts of the

In the case of S.Priyakrishnan Vs. The Regional Passport Officer, The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petition sought to forbear any proceedings against the petitioner’s passport. On July 31st, 2020, The High Court put the order of the trial court to impound